Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 63 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.6, updated 2026-09-11.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Stunt Car Games 3D on Mega Ramp! Enjoy Stunt Driving Game on impossible tracks
Welcome to the wonderful experience on stunt car mega ramp games 3d. You can megaramp stunt games without internet. If you are looking for car stunt games as well of death then this crazy car stunts simulator is specially for you. Begin the mega ramp car stunts games 3d with your stuntman inside, as for boy is developed by the amazing team for you. Stunt driving game is a low mb car game, which includes all the excitement to entertain you with crazy stunts games.
We are adding our games mega ramp stunt car simulator games in the category of stylized games to bring real fun of stunt driving games & impossible tracks with multiple thrilling adventures of ramp stunt car driving games of ultimate mega ramp like well of death.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 3 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Mintegral, Pangle (ByteDance)
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:520f8baa8da4bffcc34127dc887d1b5581d539a43448a34a6fae926e50064b13Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Watch the entire video to claim your reward"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:520f8baa8da4bffcc34127dc887d1b5581d539a43448a34a6fae926e50064b13No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.6, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.6, updated 2026-09-11.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
car-stunt-races-3dAssessed 2026-10-27 from 63 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.