Cast to TV - Screen Mirroring is the easiest way to screen mirror your phone…
BoostVisionFrom our automated analysis, 14 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.1.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-14 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.1.0, updated 2026-09-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Cast to TV - Screen Mirroring is the easiest way to screen mirror your phone to Smart TV in HD.
With this powerful screen mirroring app, you can cast to TV instantly, stream movies, mirror games, and share photos wirelessly.
Compatible with Roku, Fire TV, Chromecast, Samsung TV, LG TV, Vizio, Sony, TCL, Hisense, Vizio, and more Smart TVs.
📺 Cast to TV Features:
✔ Cast to TV in HD quality
✔ Cast web videos and online streams
✔ Screen Mirroring in HD quality
✔ Mirror Android phone to Smart TV wirelessly
✔ Stream movies, photos & music to TV
✔ Add IPTV m3u/m3u8 playlists & cast them on Smart TV
✔ Fast connection over WiFi – no cables needed
✔ Stable screen mirroring with low latency…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 34 distinct reviewers (5.7% of 594 reviews scanned)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
594 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 34 distinct reviewers — 5.7% of the 594 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
there was so many ads I couldn't get it to operate, everytime I hit start another ad would pop up, ridiculous, I would give zero if I could 👎
They have you set everything up and see at least 10 ads, then tell you it'll be 9.99 per week to actually use it. This app is not free and it's not cheap. the reason they have such high reviews is because they ask you to rate it when you…
Awful app. Full of ads and need to pay to do anything.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.1.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-14 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.1.0, updated 2026-09-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
cast-to-tv-google-com-boost-cast-universalAssessed 2026-10-14 from 594 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.