🐾 Embark on "Cat Snack Bar": A Unique Cat Simulator and Animal Restaurant Ad…
NEPTUNE(TREEPLLA)Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 402 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.0.218 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.218, updated 2026-08-24.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
🐾 Embark on "Cat Snack Bar": A Unique Cat Simulator and Animal Restaurant Adventure! 🐾
Dive into a world where your passion for food meets the delightful company of cats. "Cat Snack Bar" is not just any game; it's a vibrant community where the joy of food preparation and cat companionship blend seamlessly, offering an engaging tycoon experience and a standout among cat games and cute games.
🍰 Craft and Serve with a Touch of Feline Elegance! 🍰
Embark on a food game adventure that's unparalleled. From perfecting coffee brews to serving up juicy burgers and crafting intricate sushi, every dish offers a chance to delight your guests. With cats guiding your path, watch how this game takes the essence of traditional food games and elevates it to an extraordinary level in cute games style.
🌟 Grow Your Dream Eatery into a Celebrated Dining Spot 🌟
Start small and aim high.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 15 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 11 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:8c8eeb65e011b54048035ae455da8b8c4a287561100a7ef03a87ab21f395b158Aggressive ad load: raised by 53 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 8 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
Requests 4 sensitive permissions (ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, READ_PHONE_STATE); the median for 296 scanned apps in Simulation is 0
The package requests substantially more of the device's sensitive permissions than the typical app in its category. This is a measurement, not an accusation: a permission is granted because a feature needs it, and a wide request list is a reason to look rather than a finding on its own.
Package artefact
sha256:8c8eeb65e011b54048035ae455da8b8c4a287561100a7ef03a87ab21f395b158Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Please press "Continue" if you choose to start using our app."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:8c8eeb65e011b54048035ae455da8b8c4a287561100a7ef03a87ab21f395b158The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:8c8eeb65e011b54048035ae455da8b8c4a287561100a7ef03a87ab21f395b158402 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Edit: (2026 August 17) SO MUCH STUFF ON THE SCREEN Can't play it anymore! It's a good game, but the ads between levels get annoying and become unskippable. The constant pop-up of the snack bar premium is bad too, and if you leave the app…
Can't play more than 2 minutes without an in app purchase pausing my game play to show me where to spend money. constant .99 grabs for no actual value. events with severally limited free items followed by a 6.99 purchase for what is…
Too many ads, to the point that the game is unplayable. The ads get triggered every 2 minutes of gameplay.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.0.218, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.0.218 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.218, updated 2026-08-24.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
cat-snack-barAssessed 2026-10-25 from 402 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.