Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.0.10 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.0.10, updated 2026-10-25.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
How fast is your phone really charging? Charge Meter shows the live charging current in mA, so you can see which charger and cable charge your phone fastest, and how your battery is doing.
LIVE CHARGE METER
• A live red and green meter: green while power flows in, red while the phone uses it
• Current in mA, power in watts and the speed in plain words: Slow, Normal, Fast, Very fast, Super fast or Ultra fast
• Watch the charge flow: the faster it charges, the faster the meter moves
• The scale adapts to every charger, from a computer's USB port to 160 W fast chargers
• Reacts the moment you plug in or unplug
• Battery level counted live, to three decimals
FIND THE FASTEST CHARGER AND CABLE
Plug in one charger, then another, and compare the current. A worn cable or a weak charger shows up straight away.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 12 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 33 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Subscriptions renew automatically and can be cancelled any time in Google Play. Lifetime is a one-time payment."
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:8fc4b73177c50689f15a5d193a13e87c5d8d50449ead6210632a291134e02178The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "You now have Lifetime Premium. Cancel your subscription in Google Play so you aren't charged again."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:8fc4b73177c50689f15a5d193a13e87c5d8d50449ead6210632a291134e02178The app's own text says: "Get Premium to change the reminder level"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:8fc4b73177c50689f15a5d193a13e87c5d8d50449ead6210632a291134e02178The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:8fc4b73177c50689f15a5d193a13e87c5d8d50449ead6210632a291134e02178400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Very useful app, various info clearly presented. Update (May 2026): The app has become unusable, endless ads that you cannot skip. Uninstalling.
Ads have ruined it. A few seconds is fine but can't seem to get past watching adverts for games that go on forever
Used to be good, but now they're pushing too many ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.0.10, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.0.10 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.0.10, updated 2026-10-25.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
charge-meterAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.