Meet the Smartest AI Chatbot – Powered by Advanced AI models including GPT-5.…
Newway AppsNothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
From our automated analysis, 10 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 11.0.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 11.0.2, updated 2026-10-13.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 11.0.1, not the version now listed on the store.
The developer’s release notes for the newer versions, where we hold them, are in Versions and dates analysed.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Meet the Smartest AI Chatbot – Powered by Advanced AI models including GPT-5.4, Gemini 3 Pro (Nano Banana Pro), Claude Opus 4.6, Grok, DeepSeek, and Qwen!
Unlock endless possibilities with the ultimate AI Chatbot for conversations, learning, and creativity. Whether you want to chat with AI, ask AI for insights, or explore new ideas, this app integrates cutting-edge models to deliver intelligent, deep reasoning, and advanced computing capabilities.
New update: Now upgraded with the latest GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6 — the newest generation of advanced AI models delivering stronger reasoning, faster responses, and more accurate results across text, code, and multimodal tasks.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "lifetime plan"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:05d0d4962d3cd698f644b15661a618bac0eb8e4b847b8f989136c3775aaa374bThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch ad to get"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:05d0d4962d3cd698f644b15661a618bac0eb8e4b847b8f989136c3775aaa374bPurchase screen steers the choice: "Best deal"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:05d0d4962d3cd698f644b15661a618bac0eb8e4b847b8f989136c3775aaa374bDeadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Your offer expires in:"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:05d0d4962d3cd698f644b15661a618bac0eb8e4b847b8f989136c3775aaa374bNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 11.0.1, scanned 10 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 11.0.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 11.0.2, updated 2026-10-13.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 11.0.1, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
No release notes were provided for this version.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
chatbot-ai-google-newway-open-chatgpt-ai-chat-bot-freeAssessed 2026-10-10 from 444 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.