Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 7 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 1.121 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-07 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.121, updated 2026-09-24.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
ChatBox is a multi-model AI chatbot and productivity hub for exploring GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and other leading AI models. Trusted by over 20M users worldwide, ChatBox helps you compare AI answers, research live sources, analyze documents, create text, visuals, and work-ready drafts, use advanced OCR, debug code, and manage prompts in one AI workspace.
WHY CHATBOX
Unlike most AI chatbot apps, which lock you into a single model ecosystem, ChatBox lets you send the same prompt to multiple AI models and compare their answers side by side — without needing separate subscriptions or having to switch between apps.
Best for:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Hard to cancel: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.9% of 530 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Trial converts to a charge: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.3% of 530 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
Constant upsell pressure: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.1% of 530 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Declining an upgrade is written as a loss ('No thanks, I don't want to improve'), or users report being repeatedly pushed to subscribe during normal use.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
530 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Can’t do the free trial without agreeing to future payment — Free trial requires using apple pay and agreeing to being charged in 3 days unless you cancel instead of the app simply being time limited so you can try without having to jump…
Zero stars — This does not follow prompts even remotely closely, resulting in a lackluster product. Cancelling in app is impossible. Buckle up.
To hard to use — Almost impossible to cancel a subscription.
Can’t do the free trial without agreeing to future payment — Free trial requires using apple pay and agreeing to being charged in 3 days unless you cancel instead of the app simply being time limited so you can try without having to jump…
Worst AI to date — Three day free trial charge me $32.42 Scammed from the beginning. constantly asking to upgrade. This is by far the worst app ever
Scam — Please do not download this app I downloaded for free trial cancelled immediately and I can’t get them to stop trying to charge me you can’t get ahold of any kind of support
STOLE MY MONEY — I PAID FOR THIS APP FOR A YEARLY PLAN AND IT KEEPS ASKING ME TO RESTORE MY SUBSCRIPTION!! I’m unable to use this apps full capacity with all features!! I emailed them once and they denied my request. I emailed them a…
Pro license does nothing — I pay for pro and it says unlimited messages but every time I try and chat, I get a pop up to buy pro. I ALREADY BOUGHT PRO. waste of money.
Easy to use from my iPhone except… — I really enjoy using this app and rely on it daily for both creative tasks and professional business communication. The "creative thinker" and "legal" modes have been particularly helpful for drafting…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.121 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-07 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.121, updated 2026-09-24.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Greetings! It's ChatBox here with a great update for you: • Meet GPT-5.6—ask anything and get faster, more accurate responses with improved reasoning and smoother conversations. As always, your feedback is highly valued, so please don't hesitate to share your thoughts on the App Store!
Appworthy
chatbox-apple-6447763703Assessed 2026-10-07 from 530 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.