Why CONFIRMED adidas CONFIRMED brings you rare and iconic sneaker releases, l…
adidasSome warnings 3 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 6.16.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 6.17.0, updated 2026-10-15.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Why CONFIRMED
adidas CONFIRMED brings you rare and iconic sneaker releases, luxury streetwear collaborations, and verified draw access, across sneakers, apparel, and accessories.
Explore releases, set reminders, and shop limited collections with stories that bring each drop to life.
adidas CONFIRMED members are a community of true Originals where you’ll find stories that shape style and culture and collabs curated for you.
Shop adidas exclusives
• Exclusive products: adidas Originals sneakers, apparel, and accessories for everyone — men’s, women’s, unisex, and kids.
• Limited-edition edition collabs: Look out for BAPE, Bad Bunny, Edison Chen, Fear of God, GUCCI, Moncler, Pharrell Williams’ Humanrace, Willy Chavarria, Y 3, and more.
Get started
Create your profile, add sizes and payment details, and enable notifications — so you’re ready on drop day.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 6 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:7ad1a4acc4409c5048133cd3681f951ecaea3f4472aa6be89253f3efc6909b0bThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Get a better app experience and access to special benefits. Complete your profile now."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:7ad1a4acc4409c5048133cd3681f951ecaea3f4472aa6be89253f3efc6909b0bOffers a trial ("Security code must contain 4-digit number on the front of your card") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:7ad1a4acc4409c5048133cd3681f951ecaea3f4472aa6be89253f3efc6909b0bDeadline pressure in the app's own copy: "OFFER ENDS IN"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:7ad1a4acc4409c5048133cd3681f951ecaea3f4472aa6be89253f3efc6909b0bThe app's own text says: "Continue as a guest"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:7ad1a4acc4409c5048133cd3681f951ecaea3f4472aa6be89253f3efc6909b0bNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 6.16.0, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 6.16.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 6.17.0, updated 2026-10-15.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
confirmedAssessed 2026-10-24 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.