Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 116 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 3.27, updated 2026-10-20.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Tired of your basic Android contacts app and dialer? Upgrade to Contacts – Smart Contact Manager & Phone Dialer!
This all-in-one solution goes beyond storing numbers. Manage, customize, secure, and clean your address book with advanced tools built for speed, efficiency, and control.
📞 All-In-One Contact & Dialer Solution
- Access your complete Contacts List, Recent Call Logs (incoming, outgoing, missed), and easy Favorites / Speed Dial.
- Replace your default dialer with a fast, clean, and modern experience.
✨ Smart Calling Features
- Call Announcer: Hear the caller’s name before you even look at the screen – perfect for hands-free use.
- Flash on Call: Bright LED flash alerts so you never miss important calls.
- Fake Call: Escape awkward moments or play harmless pranks by scheduling realistic fake calls.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:f251580dad6c9b0cf7a590ec1a45ebc1f8190c8fa10960754da76c09df3ab373Aggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 23 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:f251580dad6c9b0cf7a590ec1a45ebc1f8190c8fa10960754da76c09df3ab373Sells a randomised reward ("Finish playing to get rewards") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:f251580dad6c9b0cf7a590ec1a45ebc1f8190c8fa10960754da76c09df3ab373The app's own text says: "Are you sure to delete all contacts from bin. You cannot recover it"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Package artefact
sha256:f251580dad6c9b0cf7a590ec1a45ebc1f8190c8fa10960754da76c09df3ab373The app's own text says: "Continue as %1$s"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:f251580dad6c9b0cf7a590ec1a45ebc1f8190c8fa10960754da76c09df3ab373116 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Too much ads... open source is Enough.. why premium. Uninstall it immediately .
great interface nice job ads is too much
bad app.toooooo many ads(
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.9, scanned 30 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 3.27, updated 2026-10-20.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
contacts-google-contact-dialpad-phonedialerAssessed 2026-10-30 from 116 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.