No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 14 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.18.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-14 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.19.1, updated 2026-10-12.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.18.0, not the version now listed on the store.
The developer’s release notes for the newer versions, where we hold them, are in Versions and dates analysed.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to Cube Topia 3D, a relaxing and engaging 3D puzzle experience where observation, timing, and planning come together.
Rotate the cube, release arrows, and clear surfaces gradually. Careful observation and thoughtful decisions help create smooth clearing sequences and solve spatial challenges that gradually become more complex.
The controls are simple to understand, while puzzle layouts continue to encourage deeper thinking as progress continues.
- A fully rotatable 3D puzzle environment
Cube Topia 3D takes place on an interactive three-dimensional cube. Unlike flat puzzle designs, every face contributes to the overall solution. At times, the answer may be located on the opposite side, requiring rotation and observation from different angles.
Players can rotate the cube freely, zoom in to inspect details, and study each surface before choosing the next move.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 37 distinct reviewers (3.9% of 943 reviews scanned)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 943 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
943 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 37 distinct reviewers — 3.9% of the 943 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).
the ads is too much and too long, it keeps playing the same ads every time I finished the level, and it lasts for over 2 minutes, even though I clicked on NOT INTERSTED on the ads, but it repeatedly loops, that's too much, I give up…
very relaxing. ads don't keep popping up after each level like the other one rated almost as highly as this one (how?). That one was so annoying I had to uninstall it; found this one and what a difference! I can just play and relax and…
The usual fun game of removing arrows in a certain order without colliding with one another. But an ad after EVERY level is downright evil. The ads sometime take more time than the level itself. And with no paid option of removing the…
Nothing like the ads. Just cubes. And after awhile deja vu. Same puzzles over and over. Doesn't get harder. If you like the same kind of puzzles over and over, this is the game for you. If you don't care about it being like the ads, this…
Falsely advertised as no ads but there are ads after every game.
I downloaded this game because it was advertised as having no ads, but as soon as I hit level 10, I got an ad! I will be uninstalling this despite enjoying the actual puzzles.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.18.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-14 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.19.1, updated 2026-10-12.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.18.0, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Performance improvement.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Performance improvement.
Performance improvement.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
cube-topia-3dAssessed 2026-10-14 from 943 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.