Evermatch is a dating app created for singles who are interested in serious d…
EvermatchFrom our automated analysis, 6 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.2.53 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.2.53, updated 2026-10-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Evermatch is a dating app created for singles who are interested in serious dating, meaningful relationships, and long-term compatibility. Instead of focusing on endless browsing, Evermatch helps you explore profiles through personal preferences, relationship goals, interests, lifestyle, and the qualities that matter to you in a future partner.
Whether you want to find love, build a lasting relationship, or meet a compatible partner for the future, Evermatch gives you a more focused way to approach online dating.
Find Compatibility That Matters
A strong relationship starts with more than a profile photo. Evermatch uses the information you choose to share about yourself and your preferences to help organize profile discovery around compatibility.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 51 distinct reviewers (7.4% of 685 reviews scanned)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
685 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 51 distinct reviewers — 7.4% of the 685 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
Do not install this app, this is the worst app ever. You can't do anything, they play ads every 5 seconds, I'm not talking picture ads, like 2 minutes ads, every 5 seconds, then there's the spamming bots accounts, it's terrible.
app is ok, but really have to go VIP or you have to watch endless adds. the problem is the high amount of bots that message you to keep talking. I think I might have talked to maybe one real person on this app. if they fixed this problem…
the amount of ads on this app is out of control literally every time you click on something an ad pop up DON'T DOWNLOAD lol .. aaaand they ALL bots none are real so save your breath trust me
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.2.53 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.2.53, updated 2026-10-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
dating-and-chat-google-com-evermatchAssessed 2026-10-06 from 685 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.