Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 2,385 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.

Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App

Dave, Inc

Get Paid Early, No Hidden Fees

4.8 ★1,545,634 ratings
10M+Downloads
4+Age rating
199 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

Take your finances to the next level with Dave. You could pocket up to $500¹ with ExtraCash® and so much more.

Dave Membership Information ¹Dave is not a bank. Banking services provided by Coastal Community Bank, Member FDIC. The Dave Debit Card is issued under a license from Mastercard®. ExtraCash amounts range from $25-$500, typically authorized within 5 minutes, with an overdraft fee equal to the greater of $5 or 5%. Multiple overdrafts may be required. Not all members qualify for ExtraCash and few qualify for $500. ExtraCash is repayable on demand. Must open an ExtraCash overdraft deposit account and Dave Checking account. Up to $5 monthly membership fee for ExtraCash, Income Opportunity Services, and Financial Management Services. Optional 1.5% fee for external debit card transfers. See dave.com.

UP TO $500 IN 5 MIN OR LESS¹ Remove extra stress with ExtraCash® up to $500.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App screenshot 1
Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App screenshot 2
Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App screenshot 3
Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App screenshot 4
Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App screenshot 5
Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App screenshot 6
Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App screenshot 7
Dave: Credit, Cash & Money App screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

Evidence and review signals

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated analysis in progress

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 4.12.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 4.12.0, updated 2026-09-26.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 4.11.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 4.12.0, updated 2026-09-25.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States a price and a billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 4.11.1, scanned 2026-09-28.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
6 or more requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

Positive evidence 2

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

No advertising SDKs
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 33e027a4069d…
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
What we saw: No advertising or mediation SDK among the 10 SDKs detected in the package
Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

In the app's own text: Tracking and data collection concerns
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is SDKs in the app package.artefact 33e027a4069d…
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
What we saw: Ships session-recording SDK (FullStory) that can replay on-screen activity
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.4% of 1394 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
What we saw: Reviewers report clear pricing: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (0.6% of 1394 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
“Horrible app. Hard to cancel. Once I downloaded it, all I got was the title page. I couldn't do anything else. Very hard to get off my phone. They advertised that you could get help. Not true so false advertising.”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-26
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
“Terrible and lies — I don’t like the fact that all there ADS are false advertising because it doesn’t give you anywhere near what they say on there ads example I had a direct deposit of about $2000 every other week and yesterday the extra…”
3★ · App Store · 2026-10-03
States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
“Dave has been an amazing way to borrow money when I need it! No hidden fees and you can grow the amount you borrow as you pay it back on time.”
5★ · Google Play · 2026-09-20

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 4.12.0.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Business modelFree

Prices and terms as disclosed by the store listing.