Appworthy

Dawn of Ages: total war battle

Immerse yourself in the ultimate war and civilization games experience—where…

BoomBit Games
Get it onGoogle Play
Google Play rating4.4★38K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age12+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperBoomBit Games

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 8 users report having to pay to progress; 22 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

Ads

From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 3.8.0.17 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .

The store currently lists version 3.8.0.17, updated 2026-10-19.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Immerse yourself in the ultimate war and civilization games experience—where history meets strategy in a gripping total war strategy game! Step into the medieval era, forge your kingdom through the ages, and engage in epic battle games where your war leadership shapes the future of your empire. Lead mighty knights, clad in the finest armor, as you embark on a journey of conquest and domination in the most realistic of civilization games. Welcome to the age of conquest. Enter the age of war and prove your might on the medieval battlefield in this knight games!

Your kingdom is your legacy—expand, strategize, and fight for supremacy in one of the most authentic history games ever created. Forge your civilization alliances, fortify your city, and conquer enemy lands in a strategy war games that demands tactical brilliance and strategic depth. Fans of knight games will feel right at home.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Aggressive ad load

One source only

Aggressive ad load: raised by 22 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 18 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
5.5% of the 400 reviews read.

Pay to progress

One source only

Pay to progress: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 50 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
2.0% of the 400 reviews read.

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

400 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Shown, not confirmed

The game is enjoyable, however, there are excessive ads. Even when claiming quests or navigating to the campaign to engage in battles, ads appear consistently. Regardless of the actions taken, ads are displayed automatically. This…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-15

The devoloper is so greedy,, Item in this game isn't cheap,, about $70-90. But, they give an ads every minutes and every action we do,, Ads so annoying and it's happen in every minutes.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-31

19July2026 edit: i really liked this but more than 6mos later and its still the same. how would u let us decently play the game when you forcibly make us watch 30s ads every 2-5 mins??? sometimes theres not even na option to close the add…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-18

Pay to progress

Shown, not confirmed

Good game, with m many bugs. Overall very good quality, music and art style. Really my type of medieval game, just a bit sad its demanding for u to pay to progress fast. was my favourite game. most of events are good, non of them are…

3★ · Google Play · 2026-10-21

As far as Epoch battle games go, I like this one the best, it's easy to follow and not overly complicated or pay to win. Would like to see at least chat or mail to your clan!

5★ · Google Play · 2026-09-27

this game is just too random, it's cheaper to buy a house than get a perfect weapon, it looks nice but it's hiding that big PAYTOWIN and even grind doesn't help, lol even chat is dead and performance is just terrible forget 60fps, UI is a…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-08

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 25 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 3.8.0.17 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .

The store currently lists version 3.8.0.17, updated 2026-10-19.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 3.8.0.17 · 2026-10-19

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
dawn-of-ages-google-com-stratospheregames-miniciv
Assessment date
25 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
400
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-25 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-25 Version analyzed: 3.8.0.173 independent signals400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.42 ★ · 37,962 ratings
Version
3.8.0.17
Updated
19 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
12+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
BoomBit Games
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction