DecorAI: AI Interior Design

Remodel,Home,Room,House,Garden

Rocket Digital
App Store rating4.6★1.4K ratings
Google Play rating4.4★4.2K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $4.99–$59.99
Age4+Store age rating
Size118 MBiPhone download
CategoryLifestyle

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 82 reviews and the Android app’s code.

Money

Paywalls and prices

From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 3.6.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .

The store currently lists version 3.6.9, updated 2026-10-12.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

DecorAI is an AI Interior Design app that lets you upload a photo of your room and instantly generate realistic before & after designs.

It is so easy: Upload a photo of your room, choose or enter your style & transform your home within seconds!

Turn your old and ugly rooms into new and modern rooms. Save money and time with the official DecorAI app!

Welcome to the future of interior design and home remodeling – a place where your dream space becomes a reality with just a few taps on your screen. Our AI Interior Design & Remodel App is a groundbreaking tool designed to transform the way you envision, design, and remodel your living spaces. Whether you're a professional designer, a DIY enthusiast, or simply someone looking to give your home a fresh new look, our app is tailored to meet all your needs.

Features:

Remodel Rooms and Houses with Ease:…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

2 published · 3 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 1

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Price may differ from what you see here

Measured

Paywall is server-configured and A/B tested via RevenueCat Paywalls — the offer shown can differ per user

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package
Definition

The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:c479b2bc2f86140645487abc399627fa760a1c1fe9b7d6169aa284481f8f79b7

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Trial terms not stated in the app's own text

One source only

Offers a free trial ("Free Trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:c479b2bc2f86140645487abc399627fa760a1c1fe9b7d6169aa284481f8f79b7

Usable without an account

One source only

The app's own text says: "Continue as %1$s"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:c479b2bc2f86140645487abc399627fa760a1c1fe9b7d6169aa284481f8f79b7

Works offline

One source only

The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:c479b2bc2f86140645487abc399627fa760a1c1fe9b7d6169aa284481f8f79b7

What reviewers report

82 reviews read · 0 review-based observations

No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 3.6.9, scanned 30 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
1–2 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 31 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 3.6.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .

The store currently lists version 3.6.9, updated 2026-10-12.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 3.7.0 · 2026-10-26
What's new in DecorAI - AI Interior Design Version 3.7.0 • Report content in a tap: every AI result, chat answer and report now has a flag button. Tell us if something looks wrong; you stay in the app the whole time. • Easier feedback: tell us how you like your designs right in the app. Every rating helps us make DecorAI better. • "Rate on App Store" in Settings now takes you straight to the review page. • A cleaner result screen. • iPhone Duo, iPad and landscape: DecorAI now adapts when you unfold your iPhone Duo, use Split View on iPad or turn your iPhone sideways, with photo and options side by side. • Bug fixes and performance improvements. Enjoying DecorAI? We'd love to hear from you!

Google Play

Version 3.6.9 · 2026-10-12

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
decorai
Assessment date
31 Oct 2026
Sources used
4 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest
Reviews read
82
Package examined
Android · 3.6.9 · scanned 30 Oct 2026
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-31 from 82 user reviews and the app's package.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-31 Version analyzed: 3.6.94 independent signals82 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.14Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest. Not yet checked: the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

App Store · Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.64 ★ · 1,448 ratings
Version
3.7.0
Updated
26 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
118 MB
Open in App Store

Google Play

Store rating
4.43 ★ · 4,174 ratings
Version
3.6.9
Updated
12 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Rocket Digital
Category
Lifestyle
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices. The list below covers the other store only.
Subscriptions5
Weekly SubscriptionWeekly$9.99
Weekly SubscriptionWeekly$4.99
Weekly SubscriptionWeekly$7.99
Monthly SubscriptionMonthly$17.99
Yearly SubscriptionYearly$39.99
Buy once3
Lifetime PremiumLifetime$44.99
Forever Premium AccessLifetime$59.99
Lifetime Special OfferLifetime$49.99

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.