Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.1, updated 2025-11-28.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Play FREE with ads or unlock more in the gamehouse+ app! Get GH+ Free to access 100+ games with ads, or go GH+ VIP for ad-free play, offline access, in-game perks & more!
Join Emily on a tasty Time Management adventure! Step back in time to discover the restaurants that helped shape Emily into the talented chef and restaurateur she is today.
Whether you're a longtime fan or new to her world, you can now explore the origins of Emily's cooking journey across 8 unique restaurants.
Guide Emily as she masters a variety of cuisines—from comforting American classics to vibrant Mexican dishes and bold Indian flavors. With your help, Emily will hone her cooking skills and whip up delicious dishes to serve to hungry customers.
Tackle 80 Time Management cooking levels and unlock Endless mode for infinite culinary fun.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 6 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), ironSource / Unity LevelPlay, Meta Audience Network and 2 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:44a970afbcec470a8e029c76473387d82240c07ab0841565fead45d0325eb5f5Aggressive ad load: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 40 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:44a970afbcec470a8e029c76473387d82240c07ab0841565fead45d0325eb5f5The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:44a970afbcec470a8e029c76473387d82240c07ab0841565fead45d0325eb5f5400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
This is an amazing game! The storyline is on point and adventurous as well!! You get to decorate your restaurant's and upgrade your staff, kitchen and food!!! Then comes the ads!!!! why do you have it set up to watch ads before and after…
It was a fun game but only 80 levels. Also, too many ads.
I usually love Emily games - but when I downloaded this game, and you MAKE me watch an ad to move on or play a level - immediately uninstalled the game. Super sad you made it that way. Nothing like "Delicious World", that I enjoyed playing.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.1, scanned 30 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.1, updated 2025-11-28.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
What’s New? - Updated Unity framework - Adjusted the score required to earn the 3rd star in Levels 61–70 when playing on Hard difficulty - Fixed an issue where the bottom part of the screen was cut off on some iPad models - Other minor fixes
No release notes were provided for this version.
delicious-apple-6503895699Assessed 2026-10-31 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.