Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 603 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.78.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.78.0, updated 2026-10-22.
This analysis describes version 2.77.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-22 .
The store currently lists version 2.77.0, updated 2026-10-09.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Manage your blood sugar and lose weight without stress,
by detecting and tracking unhealthy ultra-processed food.
Created by Registered Dietitians and Diabetes Care Specialists.
Track your meals, get instant feedback, and find healthy options with the GoCoCo App!
Type 2 diabetes and prediabetes-friendly, allergy-safe, and gluten-free diets made easy.
Enjoy the benefits regular GoCoCo users see:
- 85% consume fewer ultraprocessed foods
- 84% manage better their diabetes
- 89% consider the app helps them lose weight
- 86% feel better after using GoCoCo for some time
Eat Healthier, Live Happier: Using the GoCoCo App, making smart choices about what you eat has never been easier! Start your journey today and see positive changes in your blood sugar levels and your weight. Some users already improve their blood sugar management after one week!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
The store privacy disclosure (3 entries) names no tracking or advertising use, but the package ships 5 advertising/tracking SDKs: Adjust, CleverTap, Firebase Analytics, Meta (Facebook) SDK
Tracking or advertising SDKs are present in the package that the store's own privacy disclosure does not account for.
Paywall is server-configured and A/B tested via Superwall — the offer shown can differ per user
The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:05ce983133208cb153e95b22973de2320d10e1b3b9fdc34fc90b06234ad5a199Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Lifetime access"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:05ce983133208cb153e95b22973de2320d10e1b3b9fdc34fc90b06234ad5a199No advertising or mediation SDK among the 13 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:05ce983133208cb153e95b22973de2320d10e1b3b9fdc34fc90b06234ad5a199Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Purchase screen steers the choice: "Best value"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:05ce983133208cb153e95b22973de2320d10e1b3b9fdc34fc90b06234ad5a199No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.77.0, scanned 22 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.78.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.78.0, updated 2026-10-22.
This analysis describes version 2.77.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-22 .
The store currently lists version 2.77.0, updated 2026-10-09.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Quality improvements and Bug Fixes
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
diabetes-food-trackerAssessed 2026-10-27 from 603 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.