Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 152 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.4.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.4.0, updated 2026-10-22.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Ever dreamed of creating your own unique phone case? In DIY Aesthetic Phone Case, you can:
- Paint, draw and color with endless styles.
- Add stickers, glitter, charms and shiny accessories.
- Try cool effects like spray, stencil
Relax, get creative and show your aesthetic through amazing phone case designs.
Every case is your masterpiece!
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 9 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager) and 5 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:d11239afb4fe184633f32e93f6cc1b89a85e20eb7805823acee4196363d3bf2dAggressive ad load: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 17 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:d11239afb4fe184633f32e93f6cc1b89a85e20eb7805823acee4196363d3bf2d152 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
there many adds in this game . but I like most .this game🥰 but that phone paints are many want to watch adds for all colors Soo I don't like it🤬
I like this game but it has too many adds and I want k pop demon hunters music
to many ads not fun I hate it 😠😠
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.4.0, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.4.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.4.0, updated 2026-10-22.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- Fix some bugs
No release notes were provided for this version.
diy-aesthetic-phone-caseAssessed 2026-10-30 from 152 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.