Some warnings 2 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 162 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 3.42.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 3.48.0, updated 2026-10-13.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
🏇 Legally bet on hundreds of horse race tracks, worldwide. Get in on the horse racing action with DK Horse. 🏇
Betting on horse races online has never been easier or more fun. Whether you're a seasoned punter or trying your hand at horse racing betting for the first time, DK Horse makes the horse betting experience effortless and exhilarating. Add to the thrill by placing a wager on your picks, and cheer them on to victory! 🏆
Saddle up and wager at horse racing at hundreds of horse race tracks from all around the world, including America's biggest horse racing events. Bet on the Kentucky Derby, Preakness Stakes, Belmont Stakes (the Triple Crown), the Breeders Cup, and more horse races! Stream live horse races, bet on your favorite horse races, and watch instant horse racing replays. 🎥
Grab the reins, hold on tight, and pick your horse racing bets with DK Horse. 🐎…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Sorry, we are currently unable to accept check withdrawal for your account. To contact player services, please open a Chat from the Support menu."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:c467ecaa7590741fa7f38e205386c7f47d1d48f073aa41ed0a43fdc0835adea0Offers a trial ("%1$d Bet(s) Left!") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:c467ecaa7590741fa7f38e205386c7f47d1d48f073aa41ed0a43fdc0835adea0The app's own text says: "Are you sure you want to Delete All messages?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Package artefact
sha256:c467ecaa7590741fa7f38e205386c7f47d1d48f073aa41ed0a43fdc0835adea0The app's own text says: "Make randomized Jackpot 8 tickets with one tap for a shot at the massive carryover pool, plus a Single Winner Bonus*. Test your luck at the races!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:c467ecaa7590741fa7f38e205386c7f47d1d48f073aa41ed0a43fdc0835adea0The app's own text says: "%1$s are not available at this time. Check back later."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:c467ecaa7590741fa7f38e205386c7f47d1d48f073aa41ed0a43fdc0835adea0Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.42.2, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.42.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 3.48.0, updated 2026-10-13.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
dk-horse-racing-and-betting-google-com-dkhorse-androidAssessed 2026-10-24 from 162 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.