“still running fake ads — the ads are nothing like the game. no you don’t get to chose where and what type of base to build.”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 2,527 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-06.
4.5 ★2,862,733 ratings
100M+Downloads
12+Age rating
3073 MBApp size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
A dark veil sweeps across the wasteland, and the undead bride awakens from her slumber. The limited-time Undead Bride-themed event is now live!
At midnight, the church bells toll, and a bride draped in shadow returns from oblivion. Her vows, long buried beneath the dust of time, have become a mysterious power sweeping across the wasteland. Walk beside her to uncover the past and stand against the silent curse spreading through the apocalypse. Join the Undead Bride-themed challenges to unlock exclusive cosmetics and generous rewards.
Make your choice before the midnight bells ring. Will you be her ally or become part of her collection?
Doomsday: Last Survivors is a zombie survival game with multiplayer online competition and real-time strategy elements. Set in a near future where zombies have taken over the world, survivors must fight for their lives and humanity's future.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.61.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.61.0, updated 2026-09-28.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.61.5 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.61.5, updated 2026-09-30.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States a price and a billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 1.61.5, scanned 2026-10-06.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 19.99 — a 20x spread across 10 items
Positive evidence 2
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
No advertising SDKs
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
What we saw: No advertising or mediation SDK among the 9 SDKs detected in the package
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
In the app's own text: Paywall with no way past it
A paywall screen ships with no dismiss, skip or 'maybe later' affordance anywhere in the package, so the app's own text offers no way in without paying.
What we saw: Ships a purchase screen ("onPurchaseResponse: already purchased, should never get here for a consumable.") with no dismiss, skip or "continue free" text anywhere in the package
In the app's own text: Hard to cancel
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 15 distinct reviewers (2.8% of 532 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 27 distinct reviewers (1.4% of 1995 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“Fake ads — Good game but I’m tired of seeing the fake ai ads it’s funny it says in the ad stop playing these fake building games n the ad shows a completely different game do not download it if u think it will be what it’s advertised as”
“Fake ad for a city/base build game — Funny how these city/base building games always have the fake ads to bring you in. Shows you a snippet of game play and you end up having to build a base, join a guild, etc. Why not just create a game…”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 1.61.0.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown10
Lowest$0.99
Highest$19.99
VIP Pack 1$0.99
Subscription A3$4.99
Special Pack R1$4.99
Special Pack S1$9.99
Special Pack O1$0.99
Show 5 more purchases
Special Pack U1$19.99
Special Pack D26$4.99
Special Pack Q1$2.99
Special Pack P1$1.99
Special Pack D57$4.99
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.