eDreams: Flights, Hotels, Cars

Thinking about travelling?

eDreams App
Google Play rating4.3★244.3K ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryLifestyle
DevelopereDreams App

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 35 users report unexpected charges; 21 users report trouble cancelling and 4 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

Positives

From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 4.1477.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 4.1477.0, updated 2026-10-26.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Thinking about travelling? Are you looking for a cheap flight? Download our app and make the trip of your dreams! Book your flights with eDreams and get the best travel deals.

We'll take care of finding cheap travel deals for you: Finding flight tickets, showing you the best hotels and other accommodations for your stay, negotiating great deals on your rental car or arranging your ride from the airport to your destination. We've got you covered!

Cheap flights

*Search and find cheap flights among our more than 600 airlines, such as: United Airlines, American Airlines, Spirit Airlines, Ryanair, Easyjet, Air Europa and many more.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

2 published · 8 shown, not confirmed

Positives 2

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

No advertising SDKs

Measured

No advertising or mediation SDK among the 9 SDKs detected in the package

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package
Definition

No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:94e61c49526567d51e56a64994e355f677a3f2e4fd2bb2f0ddd1c7b050a15f1b

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The app's own on-screen text and the store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package. From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 8

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Tracking and data collection concerns

One source only

Ships session-recording SDK (FullStory) that can replay on-screen activity

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:94e61c49526567d51e56a64994e355f677a3f2e4fd2bb2f0ddd1c7b050a15f1b

Hard to cancel

One source only

Hard to cancel: raised by 21 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 19 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
5.3% of the 400 reviews read.

A plan is pre-picked as 'recommended'

One source only

Purchase screen steers the choice: "Best deal"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:94e61c49526567d51e56a64994e355f677a3f2e4fd2bb2f0ddd1c7b050a15f1b

Reports of unexpected charges

One source only

Surprise charges: raised by 35 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 11 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
8.8% of the 400 reviews read.

Trial terms not stated in the app's own text

One source only

Offers a trial ("Free cancellation up to 7 days after your booking!") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:94e61c49526567d51e56a64994e355f677a3f2e4fd2bb2f0ddd1c7b050a15f1b

Countdown-timer purchase pressure

One source only

Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited time offer"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:94e61c49526567d51e56a64994e355f677a3f2e4fd2bb2f0ddd1c7b050a15f1b

Usable without an account

One source only

The app's own text says: "Log in"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:94e61c49526567d51e56a64994e355f677a3f2e4fd2bb2f0ddd1c7b050a15f1b

Works offline

One source only

The app's own text says: "No Internet Connection"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:94e61c49526567d51e56a64994e355f677a3f2e4fd2bb2f0ddd1c7b050a15f1b

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

400 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Hard to cancel

Shown, not confirmed

worst ever, its almost impossible to cancel your subscription and they will charge you 100 eur yearly, not to mention they sign you up unclearly when you buy online. realy bad company and experience Extra charges for luggage, seat…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-26

They lure you into a Prime free trial during the booking process, but cancelling it is deliberately made extremely difficult. The cancellation option is either hidden or simply doesn't work, and you're pushed into making an international…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-03

​Do NOT trust this app or sign up for their "free trial." ​They intentionally hide the cancellation button behind layers of confusing menus so you can’t cancel before the trial ends. When their attempt to bill me €100 failed, instead of…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-01

Reports of unexpected charges

Shown, not confirmed

★☆☆☆☆ Warning: be careful with eDreams. I used this site only to book a flight. After payment, I was charged €64.99 for a Prime Plus annual subscription that I did not knowingly agree to or clearly consent to. Customer support refused a…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-30

Scam warning! I purchased an airline ticket through this app because the price was heavily discounted. Six months later, I was unexpectedly charged €99.99 for a Prime membership that I never knowingly subscribed to. The worst part is that…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-19

I only wanted to buy a ticket through this app, but I was unexpectedly charged €99.99 for a subscription that I did not knowingly agree to. The subscription terms were not clear to me during the purchase process. This experience has been…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-08

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 4.1477.0, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
3–5 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 27 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 4.1477.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 4.1477.0, updated 2026-10-26.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 4.1477.0 · 2026-10-26

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
edreams-google-com-edreams-travel
Assessment date
27 Oct 2026
Sources used
6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
400
Package examined
Android · 4.1477.0 · scanned 27 Oct 2026
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 4.1477.06 independent signals400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.27 ★ · 244,314 ratings
Version
4.1477.0
Updated
26 Oct 2026
Price
Free
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
eDreams App
Category
Lifestyle
Listing price
Free

No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.