1.Voyaging through thick and thin, the fire remains unfading 2.A new chapter…
NetEase GamesSome warnings 29 users report having to pay to progress. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.9.197 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.9.197, updated 2026-09-01.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
1.Voyaging through thick and thin, the fire remains unfading
2.A new chapter for Interstellar Exploration
The ancient faction of Sleepers have descended!
CONCORD has discovered a mysterious interstellar signal, and the ancient faction "Sleeper" has come to New Eden, reigniting the war!
3.New Implant System
Comprehensive upgrade for Capsuleers!
Brand-new upgradeable system - "Implant", a variety of options for you to choose how to develop as a Capsuleer.
4.Cooperative team-up for PVE modes
Free to challenge a variety of difficult modes!
Team up to challenge the Dormant Realm and surpass your limits in ever-increasing difficulty!
5.Opening ceremony for the Starfaring Festival
Countless ships parading and dropping great gifts!
The Voyage Ceremony will begin with thousands of ships parading at the same time, and countless gifts will be given away for participation.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 6 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:f623a2f0c2defb1171611eca7d4cf5d6858376fc6cec70e796d1029ccd6b5debThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 29 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 14 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
The app's own text says: "Continue as %1$s"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:f623a2f0c2defb1171611eca7d4cf5d6858376fc6cec70e796d1029ccd6b5debNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I think the game is great yes has some bugs but still worth it, ppl say pay to win well it is if you want it to be, need to pay sub thats also normal just like eo or any mmo. you can pay 5 bucks a week to omega its really affordable. only…
extremely pay to win. stay away from this game. if you do not spend money you will never get ahead in this game. if you don't pay subscriptions you can't get the better ships and even if you stop paying subscriptions after you own the…
it's a brilliant game but it's clear that devs favourite 1 particular alliance and assist them in dominating the game. they are the only alliance allowed to break rules. basically if you join the game be prepared to be bullied. pay to…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.9.197, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.9.197 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.9.197, updated 2026-09-01.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
eve-echoesAssessed 2026-10-24 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.