The old 2015 classic legend Extreme Car Driving Simulator version of the open…
AxesInMotion RacingSome warnings 14 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 304 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 0.0.7 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 0.0.7, updated 2026-09-28.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
The old 2015 classic legend Extreme Car Driving Simulator version of the open world car simulator with nostalgic advanced real physics engine.
Ever wanted to try a sports car simulator? Now you can drive, drift and feel a racing sports car!
Remember this? Tradition of all Extreme Car Driving Simulator players: resetting a lot to fly on top of buildings, trying to get the coin on top of the mountain and doing stunts in the airport area.
Try again the OG legendary cars, the nostalgic maps and the classic maps and gameplay!
Be a furious racer on a whole city for you. No need to brake because of traffic or racing other rival vehicles, so you can perform illegal stunt actions and run full speed without the police chasing you!
Drifting fast and doing burnouts had never been so fun! Burn the asphalt of this timeless open world city!
Old Classic Game Features…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 14 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
304 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WANTED! As someone who started playing this game in 2014 (back when axes in motion was called turbo gt racing games hehe); I experienced a ton of nostalgia and enjoyed thoroughly this remaster... But i do have some…
bro this game is soo good play it but the only problem is the ads every single minute an ad gets up to me otherwise it's a nice game. keep it up
I miss the old days where there weren't so many ads. My experience was terrible from the ads. The Reventon. Yes, the Reventon. Everybody's most FAVORITE part of the old Extreme Car Driving Simulator. Was so messed up. I could not tell…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 0.0.7 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 0.0.7, updated 2026-09-28.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
extreme-car-driving-legendsAssessed 2026-10-26 from 304 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.