Facetune – The Ultimate AI Photo & Video Editor Transform your photos and vid…
Lightricks Ltd.Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
From our automated analysis, 6 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.60.0.1-free of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.60.0.1-free, updated 2026-10-11.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Facetune – The Ultimate AI Photo & Video Editor
Transform your photos and videos effortlessly with Facetune, the fastest, easiest way to glow up your content. Whether it’s a quick selfie, a polished headshot, or a scroll-stopping video, Facetune is your one-stop editing tool for standout results—no pro skills required.
✨ AI-Powered Photo & Video Editing
From one-tap fixes to advanced retouching, Facetune’s AI tools handle it all. Smooth skin, brighten eyes, reshape features, or experiment with bold new styles. Want more control? Fine-tune every detail manually.
Instantly enhance photos with filters & one-tap edits
Retouch single frames or entire videos in seconds
Add glam makeup, test new hairstyles, or change your hair color with a tap…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One-Time Purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:e7fd5321b9c7405241ad5f5c8dd0d8dec3b53ae47ca3151f910d248b102cef7aThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships session-recording SDK (FullStory) that can replay on-screen activity
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
Package artefact
sha256:e7fd5321b9c7405241ad5f5c8dd0d8dec3b53ae47ca3151f910d248b102cef7aProgress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a Video to Continue"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:e7fd5321b9c7405241ad5f5c8dd0d8dec3b53ae47ca3151f910d248b102cef7aPurchase screen steers the choice: "Most Popular"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:e7fd5321b9c7405241ad5f5c8dd0d8dec3b53ae47ca3151f910d248b102cef7aNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 2.60.0.1-free, scanned 17 Sep 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.60.0.1-free of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.60.0.1-free, updated 2026-10-11.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
facetune-google-com-lightricks-facetune-freeAssessed 2026-10-06 from 505 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.