Strange friends fall from the sky and they need you to rescue them!
ABI GAMES PTE. LTD.Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 234 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.2.48 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.48, updated 2026-10-02.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Strange friends fall from the sky and they need you to rescue them!
One person can be saved but what if multiple people fall at once? Is it possible? Let's figure it out!
💀 CONNECTING THE RIGHT DOTS
There will be dozen of dots to fool you, the only way to save the friends and kill the demons is to choose the right dots. Use the rope to throw into right place. Be careful with your move. Avoid the saw wheel and the bomb or you will fall right into the thorn and die .
1. RESCUE FRIENDS, KILL THE DEMONS 💀
Do not save the red demons! They are not our friends. Try your best to rescue ONLY HUMAN with equipped ropes. Fall people must be all alive to win.
2. DIVERSE SKINS AND MAPS 🗺️
Be well-prepared with your rope anytime! People fall from the sky when you least expect the most. In day time or in the dark, sunny or raining, so always be ready for it.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:d546d95d494415c483a09a2da8cf5f77439e44aa3b58628cb90f5d864250f973Aggressive ad load: raised by 14 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 17 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
234 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
nothing but ads. also I hate how the level tells you how to beat it straight from the start, defeats the purpose of the game. 0 stars, would not recommend.
I think that it would be better for more levels. I just turned on airplane mode and got rid of a lot of ads, which is good, tho.
fun but too many ads especially the ones covering the next level button.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.2.48, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.2.48 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.48, updated 2026-10-02.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
fall-boysAssessed 2026-10-26 from 234 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.