Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 18 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 17.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-18 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 17.5, updated 2026-08-18.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Download Fandango – the #1 movie ticketing app with over 2 million 5-Star Reviews! Available across iOS devices including iPhone, iPad, iMessage and Apple Watch! Buy movie tickets, watch the newest trailers, browse Rotten Tomatoes® scores, and find the best showtimes and seats for more than 31,000 screens nationwide.
• BUY MOVIE TICKETS: Get your tickets ahead of time to skip the box office line and secure the best seats to the biggest movies. Save time with mobile tickets using your iPhone’s Apple Wallet or Apple Watch for quick and easy entry.
• FREE ACCOUNT: Checkout as a Guest or sign up for free for a faster, more convenient ticketing experience. Save your favorite movies, preferred theaters, payment info, and theater rewards account information while earning Fandango VIP+ rewards with each ticket.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 22 distinct reviewers (3.7% of 595 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
595 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
To many ads at checkout — Convenient app but there are to many promotions at checkout .
Omg so many ads — Can’t do anything without clicking through a dozen advertisements. I get that you need to make money, but holy cow, there are SO MANY ADVERTISEMENTS
Garbage spam — Horrible app with constant pop-up advertisements. I just spent money on the application I don’t need pop ups popping up while using the application and redirecting me to other things.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 17.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-18 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 17.5, updated 2026-08-18.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
• Bug fixes and performance enhancements
Appworthy
fandango-apple-307906541Assessed 2026-10-18 from 595 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.