Fasting Tracker • Easy Fast

Intermittent Fasting Timer

Samtark Pty Ltd
App Store rating5.0★9.1K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $0.99–$49.99
Age4+Store age rating
Size79 MBiPhone download
CategoryHealth & Fitness

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 7 users report the basics being behind a paywall; 5 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 394 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

  • Free to download · in-app purchases $0.99–$49.99 (10 listed, the most the App Store shows). The store doesn’t say how often these bill.
  • If you subscribe through the store, cancel in iPhone Settings → your name → Subscriptions. Deleting the app doesn’t cancel a subscription.

Paywalls and prices

Ads

From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 1.3.62 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 1.3.62, updated 2026-10-22.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Start your intermittent fasting journey with Easy Fast — the simple, ad-free fasting app and habit tracker designed for weight loss and lasting results.

Trusted by 2.4M+ fasters and rated 4.9 stars on the App Store.

Hi, I'm Sam. I'm a solo developer and a long-time faster.

I created a fasting tracker that is simple, powerful, and private. No invasive ads, no required accounts, and no data mining. Just a tool to help you reach your weight loss and health goals.

CORE FEATURES (Free forever)

Easy Fast is one of the most generous free fasting apps on the store:

• Fasting Timer: Track popular daily fasts like 16:8 and 18:6.

• Flexi Plan: Open-ended fasting with no time cap.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Context 1

Facts that add context without being a charge.

Cheapest and priciest options are far apart

Measured

In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 49.99 — a 50x spread across 10 items

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the App Store listing
Definition

The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Aggressive ad load

One source only

Aggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 79 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
1.3% of the 394 reviews read.

Paywall blocks the basics

One source only

Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 56 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
1.8% of the 394 reviews read.

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

394 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

394 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Shown, not confirmed

Best Fasting Tracker!! — Tried finding alternative fasting tracking apps after Life was taken off the App Store and they all bombard you with countless ads. This is the only one I’ve found that doesn’t force you to watch ads or close the…

5★ · App Store · 2025-03-26

Doesn’t Spam With Ads! — I love how wonderfully simple this app is. It doesn’t spam my phone with ads every second and focuses on the things I want it to focus on. Great job to the creator!

5★ · App Store · 2024-09-09

Great app — Love the simplicity and that it has all I want without popup ad bloats.

5★ · App Store · 2024-07-23

Paywall blocks the basics

Shown, not confirmed

Great app but inaccessible — The app is wonderful for your tracking, however, like half of if not 3/4 of the app is blocked behind a premium paywall. But the tracking is useful nonetheless, and I don’t really know any other apps that can…

4★ · App Store · 2026-06-08

Free — Amazing free use, the entire app isnt locked behind a subscription which is perfect.

5★ · App Store · 2026-05-20

Very good! — This app is very nice for just getting in the groove if fasting. My only complaint is a lot of the stuff being put behind the premium paywall; however, overall it is a solid app.

4★ · App Store · 2026-01-30

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
90% or more five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 27 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 1.3.62 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 1.3.62, updated 2026-10-22.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 1.3.62 · 2026-10-22
Now supports iPhone Duo. We update the app regularly to fix bugs, optimize performance and improve the experience. Thanks for using Easy Fast!

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
fasting-tracker-easy-fast
Assessment date
27 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
394
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-27 from 394 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 1.3.623 independent signals394 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

App Store

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.96 ★ · 9,091 ratings
Version
1.3.62
Updated
22 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
79 MB
Open in App Store
Developer
Samtark Pty Ltd
Category
Health & Fitness
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Show 10 more purchases we couldn’t categorise

These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.

Easy Fast ProTerm not stated$49.99
Easy Fast ProTerm not stated$9.99
Seedling SponsorTerm not stated$1.99
TipTerm not stated$4.99
TipTerm not stated$1.99
Flourish SponsorTerm not stated$4.99
Seedling SponsorTerm not stated$0.99
Seedling SponsorTerm not stated$3.99
TipTerm not stated$9.99
Seedling SponsorTerm not stated$2.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.