“Game has regressed so much. Game became too difficult for the sake of draining your resources rather than being difficult for fun. Game has became a repetitive grind fest for event (please just give us an auto farm if your not doing any…”
Independent automated assessment · 3 signal sources · 927 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.
4.1 ★122,763 ratings
5M+Downloads
12+Age rating
155 MBApp size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
A new mobile "Fate RPG," presented by TYPE-MOON! With an impressive main scenario and multiple character quests, the game features millions of words of original story! Packed with content that both fans of the Fate franchise and newcomers will be able to enjoy.
Summary
2017 A.D. Chaldea, an organization tasked with observing Earth's future, has confirmed that human history will be eliminated at 2019. Without warning, the promised future of 2017 disappeared. Why? How? Who? By what means? AD. 2004. A certain provincial town in Japan. For the first time ever, a region that could not be observed appeared. Assuming that this was the cause of humanity’s extinction, Chaldea carried out its sixth experiment - time travel into the past. A forbidden ceremony where they would convert humans into Spiritrons and send them back in time.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
Evidence and review signals
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
App Store
This analysis describes version 2.93.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.93.0, updated 2026-09-25.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2.93.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.93.0, updated 2026-09-17.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence about the app, not a finding about it.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 79.99 — a 81x spread across 6 items
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 500 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“the game not for free to play friendly support services sucks they only support Player that have much money if you're not PAY TO WIN or don't want to spend money on the game don't play it the game is sucks for free to play players not…”
“at lb6 the whole game is based on annoying the player into spending. the games goal is to make annoying content... not scale difficulty... literally just annoying I cannot express how stupid these late game fights get and not in a good…”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 2.93.0.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown6
Lowest$0.99
Highest$79.99
167 Saint Quartz$79.99
41 Saint Quartz$23.99
76 Saint Quartz$39.99
18 Saint Quartz$11.99
5 Saint Quartz$3.99
Show 1 more purchase
1 Saint Quartz$0.99
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.