Introducing Female Fitness — a simple, effective fitness app made for women w…
Captain Show LLCSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 222 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 222, updated 2026-08-27.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Introducing Female Fitness — a simple, effective fitness app made for women who want to lose weight, tone their body, and build healthy habits with workouts you can do at home. Whether you’re starting from scratch or already training regularly, you’ll find routines that are easy to follow, motivating, and designed to help you stay consistent.
Workouts for weight loss & toning
Train with a mix of fat-burning and toning sessions that help you feel lighter, stronger, and more confident. Choose from full body workouts or focus on specific areas like glutes, abs, legs, and arms. Each workout is designed to support steady progress and a healthier routine over time.
Home-friendly training
No gym? No problem. Female Fitness is designed for at-home training, so you can exercise whenever it fits your schedule.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Paywall is server-configured and A/B tested via Adapty — the offer shown can differ per user
The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:c2cc490faf6d91cc5882d417e3a96159a558443cbf310d226352d7b9bf9a090aSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 11 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:c2cc490faf6d91cc5882d417e3a96159a558443cbf310d226352d7b9bf9a090aOpen observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships a purchase screen ("Paywall") with no dismiss, skip or "continue free" text anywhere in the package
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A paywall screen ships with no dismiss, skip or 'maybe later' affordance anywhere in the package, so the app's own text offers no way in without paying.
Package artefact
sha256:c2cc490faf6d91cc5882d417e3a96159a558443cbf310d226352d7b9bf9a090aThe app's own text says: "- automatic payments for the selected tariff. The subscription includes recurring payments. Cancel anytime in the Google Play Store"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:c2cc490faf6d91cc5882d417e3a96159a558443cbf310d226352d7b9bf9a090aThe app's own text says: "Access to all customized training plans"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:c2cc490faf6d91cc5882d417e3a96159a558443cbf310d226352d7b9bf9a090aThe app's own text says: "Nothing"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:c2cc490faf6d91cc5882d417e3a96159a558443cbf310d226352d7b9bf9a090aNo review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 222, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 222 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 222, updated 2026-08-27.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
female-fitness-google-net-female-fitness-women-workoutAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.