Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.5.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 3.5.4, updated 2026-07-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Fight List 2 – The Ultimate 2-Player Categories Trivia Game!
Challenge your friends or match up with players around the world in this fast-paced and addictive trivia duel. In Fight List 2, quick thinking and clever answers are your best weapons. With over 1000 unique themes, it’s a battle of brains where only the fastest and smartest will come out on top!
This is not your average trivia game, it's a real-time showdown. Two players. One letter. Multiple categories. A ticking timer. Can you list more valid answers than your opponent before time runs out?
From the studio behind the global hit *Fight List*, played by tens of millions of users worldwide!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 17 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AdColony, Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine and 13 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:c32f623ef42b5bb586cd79bd0e23ba6ded3efea132dfa4791e837103796219b9Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a video to get 30 seconds of extra time and beat your opponent!"
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:c32f623ef42b5bb586cd79bd0e23ba6ded3efea132dfa4791e837103796219b9Facts that add context without being a charge.
Requests 4 sensitive permissions (ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, READ_PHONE_STATE); the median for 178 scanned apps in Trivia is 0
The package requests substantially more of the device's sensitive permissions than the typical app in its category. This is a measurement, not an accusation: a permission is granted because a feature needs it, and a wide request list is a reason to look rather than a finding on its own.
Package artefact
sha256:c32f623ef42b5bb586cd79bd0e23ba6ded3efea132dfa4791e837103796219b9Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:c32f623ef42b5bb586cd79bd0e23ba6ded3efea132dfa4791e837103796219b9Sells a randomised reward ("Limited-time Surprise Lucky Bag") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:c32f623ef42b5bb586cd79bd0e23ba6ded3efea132dfa4791e837103796219b9The app's own text says: "Not enough revelation wands? Stock up in the shop!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:c32f623ef42b5bb586cd79bd0e23ba6ded3efea132dfa4791e837103796219b9The app's own text says: "Play as guest"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:c32f623ef42b5bb586cd79bd0e23ba6ded3efea132dfa4791e837103796219b9The app's own text says: "Network is unavailable, please try again later."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:c32f623ef42b5bb586cd79bd0e23ba6ded3efea132dfa4791e837103796219b9400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
FL1 version was better. FL2 was set up so you see an add practically before and after every question (5per game). Insane! Yada yada yada.. I know app needs ads.. ok 5sec yes. But 30sec ads is way too much! Specially when you get nothing…
Most of the people who download this game dont even play it and some of us people have to wait months for them to take their turns. Way too many ads
I used to love Fightlist one, it was so easy and quick to play, I enjoyed the rapid round playstyle. This one is junked full of ads that to prevent seemless playing. I'll get bored of this version pretty fast.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.5.4, scanned 30 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.5.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 3.5.4, updated 2026-07-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
• Party Room mode! Play locally with your friends! • You can now choose an avatar for your profile • Bug fixes • New themes
No release notes were provided for this version.
fight-list-2Assessed 2026-10-30 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.