Get ready to tackle the challenge of organizing your fridge in Fill The Fridge!
Rollic GamesSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 73.1.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 73.1.2, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Get ready to tackle the challenge of organizing your fridge in Fill The Fridge!
Step into the world of fridge management and experience the ultimate grocery stocking puzzle game! Perfect for fans of organization challenges and brain-teasing puzzles, this game will test your skills as you strategically place groceries, beverages, and more into your fridge’s limited space. Can you organize it all without wasting space?
How to Play?
Empty your shopping baskets and sort items in the fridge! It's up to you to find the perfect spot for each item, using strategy and logic to fit everything perfectly. With each level, the difficulty increases, and you'll need to manage more items, from food to beverages, all while keeping your fridge in tip-top shape.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:534b1c03aa54f77dd08b881f739aa197dc9a57e2bdcbd85bfadff3cfff18787aAggressive ad load: raised by 106 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 4 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Use is rationed by a refillable meter: "OUT OF LIVES"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Use is rationed by an energy/hearts/lives meter that runs out and forces a wait or a purchase.
Package artefact
sha256:534b1c03aa54f77dd08b881f739aa197dc9a57e2bdcbd85bfadff3cfff18787aMisleading advertising: raised by 20 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 20 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:534b1c03aa54f77dd08b881f739aa197dc9a57e2bdcbd85bfadff3cfff18787a400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
When I saw this game from the ad, it said NO Wi-Fi game and NO annoying ads, so I downloaded it, then I played it, I like the ASMR but then, an ad comes out. I just did one drawer (sometimes 2 or 3) and there's already an ad? And it's 1…
satisfying good game but the ads are literally lying. first of all, I tried it without WiFi and it doesn't even start, second of all, there are ads after every level oh my god. other wise the app is good, but please make it a no WiFi…
Saw an ad for this game saying it's a 'NO WIFI game'. It doesn't work without wifi and has so many ads it's unplayable. Terrible.
When I saw this game from the ad, it said NO Wi-Fi game and NO annoying ads, so I downloaded it, then I played it, I like the ASMR but then, an ad comes out. I just did one drawer (sometimes 2 or 3) and there's already an ad? And it's 1…
False advertisement. You can't play it offline there are ads.
it was fun but it advertises as "no Wi-Fi games" but it does require Wi-Fi also not lots of ads compared to some games I've plays
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 73.1.2, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 73.1.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 73.1.2, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
fill-the-fridgeAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.