Some warnings 9 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 357 reviews and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 57 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 57, updated 2026-10-15.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Do you feel bored with your basic wallpaper? Don't worry about it, with our Fish On Screen 3D Wallpaper application, you can change your wallpaper to free aquarium fish with water drop effect.
The Fish On Screen 3D Wallpaper is one of the best fish aquarium wallpaper applications. It makes your phone look like a tank of fishes with ripple effect. Set up your wallpaper or lock screen with many colored fish will make you have good spirit when you open you phone. Many special features are available for you, not only change background of the aquarium but also you can control the number or speed of the fishes!
Just select the free colored wallpaper themes and set as the background. You will be amazed that live aquarium wallpaper has many fishes moving on the screen, you can touch and feel now.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 40 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
357 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
It was sending pop-up ads on top of regular ads
Too many ads, I click 1 wallpaper, one of the fish just evaporates- clearly AI, bad AI. I click another it says 'watch ad to download' how this is well rated is beyond me
Pathetic. Bombarded with Temu adds, can't even open the fish app. Leaving Google.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 57 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 57, updated 2026-10-15.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
fish-on-screen-3d-wallpaperAssessed 2026-10-27 from 357 user reviews and the store listing. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Two independent signals are read — user reviews and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.