Some warnings 6 users report the basics being behind a paywall. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 339 reviews and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.0.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.0.6, updated 2026-10-12.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Sync Google Health (formerly Fitbit) to Apple Health with Syncfit
Syncfit makes it easy to transfer your health and fitness data from your Google Health (formerly Fitbit) account to Apple Health.
You can sync the following data:
Active Energy
Blood Oxygen
Body Fat Percentage
Body Mass Index
Cardio Fitness Score
Cycling Distance
Cycling Speed
Dietary Energy
Flights Climbed
Heart Rate
Lean Body Mass
Respiratory Rate
Resting Energy
Resting Heart Rate
Running Speed
Sleep
Steps
Swimming Distance
Walking + Running Distance
Walking Speed
Water
Weight
Workouts
Getting started is simple. Download Syncfit, connect your Google Health account, grant the required permissions, connect Apple Health, and tap Sync. You can sync your latest data or import your historical health records into Apple Health.
## Frequently Asked Questions…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 57 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
339 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Why a pay wall — The app was great and simple for transferring steps now it’s all locked behind a pay wall. I wouldn’t mind watching a short ad even before having to be charged for an additional app. I’m so sad about this.
Locked behind a pay wall — The only data you can sync is steps, everything else is locked behind monthly subscription that will cost you at minimum $10. Waste of time use another app or download your data from google and migrate it.
What happened to my Fitbit app?? — I do not like this app at all!! I have to pay to get everything Fitbit used to give me daily!!
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.0.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.0.6, updated 2026-10-12.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Added auto sync for the most recent data (Install a widget to monitor. Autosync runs 3-4 times per day). Improved sync speed and stability.
Appworthy
fitbit-sync-to-apple-healthAssessed 2026-10-27 from 339 user reviews and the store listing. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Two independent signals are read — user reviews and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.