FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home

For Men, Women, and Seniors

EXTRAMILE LIMITED
App Store rating4.8★80.1K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $9.99–$59.99
Age4+Store age rating
Size219 MBiPhone download
CategoryHealth & Fitness

What we found

Full report

Serious warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 1.41 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .

The store currently lists version 1.41, updated 2026-10-19.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Ever found yourself dreaming of a slimmer, fitter, healthier you, but life's pace gets in the way? Say hello to FitMe! Our brand-new fitness training app is designed just for you, ensuring the perfect workout anytime, anywhere.

Lazy workouts at home, work, wherever

Think of FitMe as your personal fitness coach, but it’s right in your pocket. This simple-to-use app helps you tackle short and effective workouts each day that fit around your daily routine.

Struggling to keep up with your workouts? No worries. Let FitMe be your companion! It helps you stay on track with goals and reminders that work subconsciously to keep you coming back time and again so that workouts are no longer work — they’re a helpful habit.

We believe in you! FitMe is packed with features to help you, including:…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 1

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Reports of unexpected charges

Reported by 32 users

Surprise charges: raised by 32 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 16 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
User reports only. Published because the review evidence cleared this label’s own reviewer threshold.
Where measured
From App Store reviews
Reported by
Raised by 32 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 16 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
Definition

A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
6.4% of the 500 reviews read on this store leg (App Store).
Published threshold
31 reviewers and 2.47% of at least 500 reviews

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Hard to cancel

One source only

Hard to cancel: raised by 25 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 20 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
5.0% of the 500 reviews read.

Usable without an account

One source only

The store privacy disclosure (8 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.

Sources
The store privacy disclosure
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From the App Store privacy disclosure

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.

Open evidence

What reviewers report

500 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Reports of unexpected charges

Published finding

Raised by 32 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 16 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).

OVER CHARGED — I tried to cancel 2 and they obviously didn’t follow my app, and they charged me twice, so I will take them to court.

2★ · App Store · 2026-10-16

Scam can’t access apple paid subscription — Twice I subscribed with apple and twice I lost access to my my subscription

1★ · App Store · 2026-10-13

Runnnn! — They will continue to charge even when you cancel membership and you can not get your money back

1★ · App Store · 2026-10-07

Hard to cancel

Shown, not confirmed

Cancellation — This is very hard to cancel. I’ve tried so many times. Do not sign up for it.

1★ · App Store · 2026-10-13

Impossible to cancel — Impossible to cancel this!!!

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-23

Total Billing Scam — After the “trial period” ends, they jack up your subscription fee and make it extremely difficult to cancel. Zero customer service. It is a total scam. I had to eventually cancel my credit card.

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-17

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 26 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 1.41 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .

The store currently lists version 1.41, updated 2026-10-19.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 1.41 · 2026-10-19
We hope you’re enjoying the app! Please, keep it regularly updated to always have our greatest features and latest improvements. - Performance and stability improvements - Bugs fixes

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
fitme
Assessment date
26 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
500
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-26 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-26 Version analyzed: 1.413 independent signals500 reviews scannedConfidence: LowNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

App Store

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.79 ★ · 80,072 ratings
Version
1.41
Updated
19 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
219 MB
Open in App Store
Developer
EXTRAMILE LIMITED
Category
Health & Fitness
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Subscriptions7
Weekly Premium AccessWeekly$9.99
Monthly Premium AccessMonthly$19.99
Monthly Premium AccessMonthly$29.99
Monthly Premium AccessMonthly$14.99
Quarterly Premium AccessEvery 3 months$38.99
Half-year Premium AccessYearly$59.99
Yearly Premium AccessYearly$24.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.