Boss, your gym is overcrowded, so come build a unique luxury gym!
Hello Games TeamSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.0.5 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 2.0.5, updated 2026-08-13.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Boss, your gym is overcrowded, so come build a unique luxury gym!
"Fitness Club Tycoon" is a casual simulation game with exquisite graphics. In the game, you will play the role of a slimming club's boss, annd run slimming boot camps, help customers who need to slim down exercise to lose weight and help them regain their perfect figure. As the boss, your task is to set up a team of excellent trainers, turn this place into a first-class gym and launch a chain full of stores all over the world! (oﾟ▽ﾟ)
========Game Highlight========
★Build your very own gym
Huge map scenarios where you're free to expand anywhere! Like the Hawaiian style beach theme? Or do you prefer the forest theme of the Amazon rainforest? Or do you want to cover the outside of your gym with super cool rides? All you need to do is flick your fingers and it'll be right in front of you without having to wait!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:63cb721dd26c98af822a9e727264ac5dcd1dc9137dc72e2354d2eba8d87791efAggressive ad load: raised by 17 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 24 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:63cb721dd26c98af822a9e727264ac5dcd1dc9137dc72e2354d2eba8d87791efOffers a free trial ("3-day free trial for the first purchase,then charge according to the purchased content, cancel anytime") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:63cb721dd26c98af822a9e727264ac5dcd1dc9137dc72e2354d2eba8d87791efDeadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Unlock The Pass To Get Tons Of Premium Rewards, Grab The Last Chance"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:63cb721dd26c98af822a9e727264ac5dcd1dc9137dc72e2354d2eba8d87791efThe app's own text says: "No thanks"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:63cb721dd26c98af822a9e727264ac5dcd1dc9137dc72e2354d2eba8d87791ef400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
because many many ads. playing game was clos. Soo l don't like this game 😭
to much advertise, not recomend
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.0.5, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.0.5 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 2.0.5, updated 2026-08-13.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
fitness-club-tycoonAssessed 2026-10-25 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.