FM Radio offers you the best of the Radio Tuner, Internet Radio, AM & FM Radi…
AppOwnsSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 10.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 14.3, updated 2026-09-01.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
FM Radio offers you the best of the Radio Tuner, Internet Radio, AM & FM Radio Stations Online in one app.
If you want to listen to the best FM Radio, AM Radio, Live Radio and internet radio stations, then Tuner Radio is the app that you should tune in. The best part is through Radio FM app, you can listen to 65,000+ Live Radio Stations globally anytime and anywhere without paying anything.
FM Radio, Radio Tuner allows you to listen to local radio and enjoy a variety of genres like gospel, songs, music, talks, news, comedy, classical, rock, pop, instrumental, hip-hop and so more
Why choose our FM Radio app:
* 📻 Radio FM allow listeners to navigate live local radio stations by country, genre, language and network.
* ❤️ Add to Favorites: You can add your favorite Radio AM, Radio Tuner, Live Radio, Local Radio and FM Radio Stations to our simple radio app.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 36 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
The listing says "you can listen to 65,000+ Live Radio Stations globally anytime and anywhere without paying anything." with no qualification anywhere in its description, while the app's own text gates use behind payment: "Paywall intent i…
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:8fee4aac7ba0d1a1524b28a14e37b413d4d3273c1fedaf11286ec2ca8ce3af8cOffers a trial ("Enjoy All VIP features like Car Mode, Removed Ads.") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:8fee4aac7ba0d1a1524b28a14e37b413d4d3273c1fedaf11286ec2ca8ce3af8cThe app's own text says: "Sign in to use this app"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:8fee4aac7ba0d1a1524b28a14e37b413d4d3273c1fedaf11286ec2ca8ce3af8c400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Too much ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 10.0, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 10.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 14.3, updated 2026-09-01.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
fm-radio-google-com-liveradio-fmradio-radiotuner-radiostation-amradioAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.