A city-building simulation game set in an ice and snow apocalypse.
Century Games PTE. LTD.Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 2 more things. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.4.12 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.4.12, updated 2026-09-29.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
A city-building simulation game set in an ice and snow apocalypse. As the chief of the last town on Earth, you have to gather resources and rebuild society.
Collect resources, assign workers, explore the wilderness, conquer tough surroundings, and use various methods in order to survive.
Game features:
🔻Survival simulation
Survivors are the basic characters in the game. They are the important work force who keep the urban area running. Assign your survivors to collect materials and work in various facilities. Mind the survivors' physical and mental health. If the food ration is in shortage or the temperature drops below freezing, the survivors may get sick; And there may be protests if the work mode or the living environment is dissatisfying.
🔻Explore in the wild
The town sits in the wide wild frozen place. There will be exploratory teams as the survivor teams grow.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:19849b0da30c2dee5182d5ff50f5cf0bf33bde2a8d93f2e3d5aa5711131e418aSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 19 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 21 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
The app's own text says: "Guest"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:19849b0da30c2dee5182d5ff50f5cf0bf33bde2a8d93f2e3d5aa5711131e418aThe app's own text says: "Reward will not be received before video completion."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:19849b0da30c2dee5182d5ff50f5cf0bf33bde2a8d93f2e3d5aa5711131e418aMisleading advertising: raised by 22 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 18 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
only 3 stars because you guys became a p2w game pretty darn fast (talking about the weekend events). in the beginning, this WAS a 5 plus star game, and then you got greedy. New update 8/27/23 lowered to 1 star. The cost to upgrade heroes…
Game is definitely fun, no doubt. But that ends somewhere around the 11th or 12th area. Turns into a pay to win real fast after that. UPDATE: ON TOP OF PAY TO WIN, I JUST GOT MY FIRST 80 SECOND AD!!! 80 SECOND AD?!?!?!?!?!?! I WILL BE…
Game was decent at first. But now I'm at "Volcano Foothills" and I'm unable to progress unless I pay to upgrade Heros. I'm not spending another penny. Frozen City is 100% a "Pay to Win" game. I'm deleting the game after this review.
Nothing like the ad, but I continued to play it for the past few days. It was nice enough at the beginning - the graphics and music were great. However, I can't progress past a certain point because without "heroes", the production line…
The photos above as showing in game play is not real, false advertisements is a serious crime. Display the actual gameplay because the first 6 photos don't exist in this game, I know I been playing this for 3 years. 😌 I give 5 stars…
Fake advertising and play store screenshots.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.4.12, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.4.12 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.4.12, updated 2026-09-29.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
frozen-cityAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.