Fun Race 3D is an action-packed game that combines parkour and racing in a fu…
CASUAL AZUR GAMESFrom our automated analysis, 5 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.46.02 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.46.02, updated 2026-08-18.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Fun Race 3D is an action-packed game that combines parkour and racing in a fun and exciting way. You will compete with opponents on hundreds of unique levels full of obstacles and traps, such as swinging hammers, spinning saws, giant balls, and more. To win races and reach the finish line, you will need to use your speed, skill, and strategy.
But this game is not just about racing; it’s also about expressing your personality and style. You can choose from a variety of characters, from slim to chubby, from human to superhero, and customize them with different clothes and accessories. Celebrate your victories with cool dances and gestures.
Fun Race 3D also features a Fun City mode where you can create your own courses with various obstacles and traps, and decorate your city with stunning beaches, cozy sun loungers, colorful umbrellas, delicious ice cream and drinks shops, and more.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 14 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange and 10 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:3e058295a9d43b1060b4743b7aadcf0e45b026b9d09ce93586f6d58150114d03Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 61 distinct reviewers (13.0% of 470 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
470 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
way too much ads
when every level cross there is an adds lots off ads plz don't download this game
Too many adverts after each level. It is so annoying
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 2.46.02, scanned 17 Sep 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.46.02 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.46.02, updated 2026-08-18.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
fun-race-3d-google-com-slippy-linerusherAssessed 2026-10-05 from 470 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.