Appworthy

GearPaw Defenders!

When the forest barrier goes CRACK— Monster invasion incoming!

Perfeggs
Get it onGoogle Play
Google Play rating4.4★22.9K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperPerfeggs

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 15 users report having to pay to progress; 14 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 294 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

Ads

From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 0.18.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .

The store currently lists version 0.18.0, updated 2026-09-24.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

When the forest barrier goes CRACK— Monster invasion incoming!

Lazy forest critters suddenly awaken: "Time to hit 'em with the Uno reverse card!"

Haystacks become HQ! Pinecones = grenades!! Forget fishing—start gear-grabbing!

Office drones' secret DLC unlocked: Defeat bosses for "Paid Procrastination Buff™". Connect gears, kick monster butt, save home!

[Addictive Gameplay]

Gears meet roguelike = Schrödinger's fun zone

Spend that combat coins! Grind for OP gear mods!

Random hero skills + gear combos = crits so savage, monsters sob like noobs!

Infinite character builds? Let's yeet these creeps to orbit!

Strategize like a boss. Yes, you—the spreadsheet warrior turned tactical genius!

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Aggressive ad load

One source only

Aggressive ad load: raised by 14 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 21 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
4.8% of the 294 reviews read.

Pay to progress

One source only

Pay to progress: raised by 15 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 20 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
5.1% of the 294 reviews read.

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

294 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

294 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Shown, not confirmed

exploitive and manipulative... This is one of those games that is designed to manipulate you into watching as many ads as possible. I downloaded this game because the concept for the gameplay seemed interesting. It is a mechanic that I…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-12-26

Because two ads are not able to end or close and you have to restart the game and too many ads. Tried some games like this before. you'll spend half day watch ads just to complete a few simple task. you can choose to skip them and you'll…

2★ · Google Play · 2025-09-30

let's you watch ads for free stuff, and I'm alright that's normal I'm okay with an ad playing for a minute. But yet you let the ads hide the buttons for everything except for the google play store button. can't even report it, which is…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-09-30

Pay to progress

Shown, not confirmed

entertaining game, very fun to play. got many hours of playtime on it. but some stuff like the red artifacts are almost only via money. so that's a pay to win game for u.

3★ · Google Play · 2026-02-17

Pay to win game, game developer are getting too greedy with their latest updates. To get good equipment you have to be ready to spend real cash on their latest updates. Definitely not recommended for free to play players since you will…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-15

Its pay to win. New mercenary mechanic is scammier than the previous gacha, definitely a money grab. Uses a lot of super annoying unmutable ads

1★ · Google Play · 2025-11-21

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 25 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 0.18.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .

The store currently lists version 0.18.0, updated 2026-09-24.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 0.18.0 · 2026-09-24

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
gearpaw-defenders
Assessment date
25 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
294
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-25 from 294 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-25 Version analyzed: 0.18.03 independent signals294 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.36 ★ · 22,889 ratings
Version
0.18.0
Updated
24 Sep 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Perfeggs
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction