Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 2,806 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.

Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary

COGNOSPHERE PTE. LTD.

Explore a World of Adventure

3.4 ★5,818,035 ratings
100M+Downloads
12+Age rating
3766 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

Step into Teyvat, a vast world teeming with life and flowing with elemental energy.

You and your sibling arrived here from another world. Separated by an unknown god, stripped of your powers, and cast into a deep slumber, you now awake to a world very different from when you first arrived.

Thus begins your journey across Teyvat to seek answers from The Seven — the gods of each element. Along the way, prepare to explore every inch of this wondrous world, join forces with a diverse range of characters, and unravel the countless mysteries that Teyvat holds...

MASSIVE OPEN WORLD

Climb any mountain, swim across any river, and glide over the world below, taking in the jaw-dropping scenery each step of the way. And if you stop to investigate a wandering Seelie or strange mechanism, who knows what you might discover?

ELEMENTAL COMBAT SYSTEM…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary screenshot 1
Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary screenshot 2
Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary screenshot 3
Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary screenshot 4
Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary screenshot 5
Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary screenshot 6
Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary screenshot 7
Genshin Impact 6th Anniversary screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 7.1.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 7.1.0, updated 2026-09-22.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 7.1.0_48052158_48145775 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 7.1.0_48052158_48145775, updated 2026-09-10.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 7.1.0_48052158_48145775, scanned 2026-09-29.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

Context 1

Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.

Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
MeasuredPublished as context — deliberately not a charge · from the store listingview evidence
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 99.99 — a 101x spread across 10 items

Positive evidence 2

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

No advertising SDKs
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 164d4e3c1f7d…
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
What we saw: No advertising or mediation SDK among the 7 SDKs detected in the package
Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 13 distinct reviewers (0.7% of 1982 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“I used to like this game but this game's monetization is absurd. It's very obvious that they want you to pay to win because a lot of the end game content that would give you good rewards are gatekept by needing to have the current banner…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-10-04
Pay to progress
“when I first started it was one of the best games I ever played.. then with time everything got difficult from summons shaft, bosses, exploring.. the world, soundtracks, characters are cool but the company is lead by greed and wants you…”
3★ · Google Play · 2026-10-03
Pay to progress
“Not f2p friendly — Only play if you’re a lore player, trying to catch up in meta is impossible for any new or return player. I have played since release and because I needed strong characters to clear endgame, I had to spend money to get…”
1★ · App Store · 2026-09-23

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 7.1.0.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.