Upgrade your chats with What’s a Gif – The ultimate GIF Keyboard and Search E…
OSmart AppsSome warnings 1 thing we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 260 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 3.0.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 3.0.4, updated 2026-10-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Upgrade your chats with What’s a Gif – The ultimate GIF Keyboard and Search Engine for Android.
Finding the perfect reaction has never been easier. Whether you want to send a funny meme, a trending animation, or a cute sticker, What’s a Gif gives you millions of options at your fingertips.
🚀 WHY USE WHAT’S A GIF?
Unlike standard apps, we combine a powerful GIF search engine with an easy-to-use GIF Keyboard. You don't need to switch apps—just search and send directly from your chat!
🔥 KEY FEATURES:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One-Time Purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:23fd78139cab7a12b61d163777e1f8bc7caa12a47e261f4b199eac2dc3023c9dOpen observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:23fd78139cab7a12b61d163777e1f8bc7caa12a47e261f4b199eac2dc3023c9dSells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:23fd78139cab7a12b61d163777e1f8bc7caa12a47e261f4b199eac2dc3023c9dNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.0.4, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.0.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 3.0.4, updated 2026-10-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
gif-keyboardAssessed 2026-10-24 from 260 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.