You will help sellers sort and classify the goods on the shelves.
MicrochaosSome warnings 7 users report an aggressive ad load; 6 users report ads that misrepresent the app. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 0.0.12 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 0.0.12, updated 2025-11-12.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
You will help sellers sort and classify the goods on the shelves. It will challenge your eyesight and brainpower! In product sorting, you can not only experience the fun of supermarket shopping, but also relieve stress and enjoy the fun of sorting products!
How to play
1. Place three same products on the same supermarket shelf.
2. Sort and clear three identical products, and then the products behind the shelves will appear.
3. Continue sorting until all shelves are empty.
4. You can win the game only by completing the game in the limited time.
Game features
FREE TO PLAY: Enjoy the game freely!
No Wi-Fi Restrictions: No network restrictions, you can play games anytime and anywhere.
Endless Levels: Multiple levels, sort products at any time!
Difficulty Mode: The difficulty increases, come and challenge yourself!
Unlock New Products: There are more new products waiting for you to unlock.
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 57 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 67 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
What a pleasure it is to find a game that allows you to really enjoy playing without having to watch endless ads or be pressured into paying. Yes, there are ads but not ones that take ages and are so frequent that you just want to give…
I really like your game but I'm forced to uninstall it because your ads interfere with my other apps for music and radio shows and it cuts them off and they stop playing... I played 16 levels of your game, tried 5 different apps of…
So when does the Christmas stuff start coming up? It's very frustrating when I'm shown a certain game that I'm interested in but that's not what I get after installing the app. Having to play 100 levels or so that I'm not interested in…
So when does the Christmas stuff start coming up? It's very frustrating when I'm shown a certain game that I'm interested in but that's not what I get after installing the app. Having to play 100 levels or so that I'm not interested in…
This is a fun game but not at all what I saw in the ad. It's not what I thought I was getting, the bigger screen where the doors close. This is just the same as all the others. Why bait and switch? Very aggravating 🙄
The ad for this app showed a Christmas theme but that is not what this app is displaying. FALSE ADVERTISING! I will be uninstalling!
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 0.0.12 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 0.0.12, updated 2025-11-12.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
goods-3d-sorting-google-com-game-gs3d-androidAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.