Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.7.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 2.7.0, updated 2026-08-11.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to this sorting puzzle game, the fun matching games and sorting games! Goods Challenge - Sort Master has triple match play and offers interesting organization games.
As a match master, step into a world full of goods – from fruits to toys, just like in bottle sort and cake sort. Are you ready to become a sorting master of this goods puzzle sort challenge?
How to Play:
In these sorting games and matching games, collect three of the same items, they will be cleared from space. It's a classic color match and color sort gameplay.
Your goal is to sort all goods in this goods triple match before the timer ends. When you play, these organization games reward you with coins and rewards, as in good games. These help unlock better tools for triple match and color sort, mastering each goods puzzle sort challenge.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:8cf5fcc64558f628a7df17f7c09a0a15ef8271d3100a0b2f60cb0dbf9132bd33Aggressive ad load: raised by 33 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 12 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 18 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
The app's own text says: "Are you sure? You will lose your reward."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Package artefact
sha256:8cf5fcc64558f628a7df17f7c09a0a15ef8271d3100a0b2f60cb0dbf9132bd33The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:8cf5fcc64558f628a7df17f7c09a0a15ef8271d3100a0b2f60cb0dbf9132bd33400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Just accidentally deleted and reinstalled this game, by far my favorite of this type, perfect for mind numbing without the impossible levels that force you to watch ads to progress.
very fast and smaooth gameplay...it duz say no timer buthere is a timer lol, nevertheless, it is fun to play! so far no ads but we shall see now that I gave 5* whether that continues or if now Ill be bombarded w ads after every round!
fun game. cute graphics & animation, but... even if you win a round, ads are forced on you. REALLY takes away from the gameplay. I deleted bc too many ads. enjoyed it during play but it feels like being penalized for winning when the…
I downloaded this game because it specifically said it DID NOT have time limits on levels. Low and behold, it does. It is fun, and I have not been forced to watch ads, but the advertisement for this game clearly lied, and is an obvious…
Don't bother downloading this one. The ad for it claimed that there were no ads and no timers, which is why I downloaded it. Well guess what? It has both. Even if you choose to claim your reward without watching an ad you're still given…
This is not an unlimited time game as advertised on their mid games adverts. This is wrong and should not be allowed. Misleading advertising! I'll uninstall now.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.7.0, scanned 30 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.7.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 2.7.0, updated 2026-08-11.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- Now available in 4 new languages: Korean, Traditional Chinese, Hindi, and Italian - Improved performance for a smoother experience Update now and enjoy the best version of the game!
No release notes were provided for this version.
goods-challengeAssessed 2026-10-30 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.