Get the official Google Calendar app, for your Android phone, tablet, or Wear…
Google LLCNothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
From our automated analysis, 18 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2026.37.0-984865732-release of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-18 . The app may have changed since.
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-10-08.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Get the official Google Calendar app, for your Android phone, tablet, or Wear OS device to stay organized and plan your day. Make the most of your day with easy event creation, multiple calendars, customizable views, widgets, tasks, and more
With Google Calendar, you can:
• Get events automatically added to your Calendar from Gmail, including flight, hotel, concert, and restaurant reservations.
• Go from using Calendar on your Android phone, tablet, or Wear OS device to your computer without missing a beat when you’re logged into the same Google account.
• Consolidate and view Google Calendar events side-by-side with other calendars on your device, including Exchange.
• Keep family, friends, and colleagues in the loop with shared calendars, so they can view, add, or modify events.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK found in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:d9e98fb01075904e2f6af84baef2d97cb4b9f0ab31d815e2fdfa343a27479b15The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 2026.37.0-984865732-release, scanned 29 Sep 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2026.37.0-984865732-release of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-18 . The app may have changed since.
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-10-08.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
google-calendar-google-com-google-android-calendarAssessed 2026-10-18 from 2,734 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.