Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,995 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery

Grab Holdings

Grab is #1 all-in-one taxi, ride hailing, transport, express grocery shopping…

4.8 ★16,750,519 ratings
100M+Downloads
4+Age rating
—App size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

Grab is #1 all-in-one taxi, ride hailing, transport, express grocery shopping and food delivery app in Southeast Asia

🏃In a rush? We’ll get you where you’re going in style. Find a taxi, carpool, or hire a car! 🍔 Satisfy your cravings: order food delivery from your favourite restaurants 🛍️ Had a long day? Save yourself a trip to the store with grocery delivery 💸 No wallet needed: use Grab to pay for shopping across the city

All in one simple, convenient app. Whatever you need, from food delivery to a last-minute taxi, Grab has you covered.

🚕 Taxi, cab, and transport services for any budget (and occasion!) ⭐️

Ride taxis in comfort: Get affordable, upfront fixed rates with JustGrab or GrabTaxi – wherever you’re going.

Discover seamless city travel in the ultimate taxi app for booking a safe and convenient ride whenever you need it.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery screenshot 1
Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery screenshot 2
Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery screenshot 3
Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery screenshot 4
Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery screenshot 5
Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery screenshot 6
Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery screenshot 7
Grab - Taxi & Food Delivery screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 5.426.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.430.0, updated 2026-09-29.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 5.426.1, not the version now listed on the store.

Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:

Version 5.430.0 · 2026-09-29

No release notes were provided for this version.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
3 or more themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
90% or more five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 5.426.1, scanned 2026-09-09.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
6 or more requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Hard to cancel
2 independent sources agreefrom user reviews and the app's own on-screen textartefact 229602265b2e…
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Cancellation copy routes the user away from a direct control: "Before you go, share with us why you're cancelling, to help us improve"

Context 1

Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.

Asks for more sensitive permissions than similar apps
MeasuredPublished as context — deliberately not a charge · from the app manifestartefact 229602265b2e…
The package requests substantially more of the device's sensitive permissions than the typical app in its category. This is a measurement, not an accusation: a permission is granted because a feature needs it, and a wide request list is a reason to look rather than a finding on its own.
What we saw: Requests 10 sensitive permissions (ACCESS_BACKGROUND_LOCATION, ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, CAMERA, READ_CALENDAR, READ_CONTACTS, READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, READ_PHONE_STATE, RECORD_AUDIO, SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW); the median for …

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 4

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

In the app's own text: Countdown-timer purchase pressure
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact 229602265b2e…
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
What we saw: Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited Offer"
Reported by users: Price keeps rising
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The price of the paid tier has been raised on existing users.
What we saw: Price keeps rising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.3% of 1995 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 13 distinct reviewers (0.7% of 1995 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: A plan is pre-picked as 'recommended'
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact 229602265b2e…
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
What we saw: Purchase screen steers the choice: "Best Value"

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Price keeps rising
“HELLOOOO!???? where's the saver ride??? The saver but solo trip ride, because no one wants to share rides with 1-2 strangers, imagine you're in a rush bro😭😭😭 and after the changes, the standard ride price increase too😭 imagine from…”
2★ · Google Play · 2026-10-04

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 5.430.0.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Business modelFree

Prices and terms as disclosed by the store listing.