“Game is fun but the money extortion level is just too much. Example: at castle upgrade level 110, it opens a new slot for a hero but it demands you pay €9.99 otherwise you can't have a hero in that slot. game is very Pay to win. and the…”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 438 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.
4.3 ★472,571 ratings
10M+Downloads
12+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
It is a defense game to protect the castle from enemy attack. If growth can be placed in the castle tower and the hero on each floor. Archer of the town is becoming a lot more more powerful the more upgrades.
More than 120 heroes can use their own skills. Some heroes are made to give a strong archers of the town, another hero is cursed enemy. This strategy is important because only a hero can be mounted up to nine.
When you build colonies and hire workers, you can earn more gold.
Clear up to a higher level, wave and check out your rankings. Create or join a online guild. You can communicate and play with people around the world.
※ Features Online guild system Real-time rankings Hero promotion system Addictive without reason Build your own castle
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
Evidence and review signals
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
We cannot tell which version of the app this analysis describes. It was run 2026-10-04 , and the app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.51.5, updated 2026-09-30.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 1.51.5, scanned 2026-10-07.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 438 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“this game is great fun adicting but its so unfair for poor player like us kids the pay to win is so expensive and its hard to earn red crystal u know why theres so many player and pay to win players we want to pay to win but its just way…”
“i love this game The only problem is p2w”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 1.51.5.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.