Ready to drown in the asmr sounds of shotgun and pranks on your friends with…
ABI GAMES PTE. LTD.Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 3.0, updated 2026-03-05.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Ready to drown in the asmr sounds of shotgun and pranks on your friends with gun sound and lightsabers!? Try the official version of 2023 Lightsaber app: Gun Simulator & Lightsaber!🔥🔥🔥
⚡Gun Simulator & Lightsaber⚡ contains all handles and gun modes you wish to own as a science fiction addict. You can experience futuristic & realistic 3D lightsaber and sci-fi gun effect all in sci-fi gun, shotgun, and lightsaber mode, in which you will be amazed by the stunning colors, many vivid visual & diffenrent shocking sound effects. Especially, you can customize the background, adjust color, turn on&off the flashlight and vibration, change weather condition when shoot, and shake or tap to fire to personallize your own gun saber with realistic 3D simulation. This app offers you with various asmr gunshot sounds and fun experience to prank friends & siblings.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:2727c215d67aa4fbaf36bf2c1f2b4e7037ad1a41d082f07786cc81588d396a70Aggressive ad load: raised by 28 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 14 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 80 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
TOO many ADVERTS I've been in the app seconds and it's already opened a chrome extension, deleting right away!
It's almost impossible to use because of SO MANY ADS. You can only have the lightsaber on for like 8 seconds before it jumps to an ad. I didn't try the gun part; maybe that's better?
Completely not like the add that shows it vomes out of phone and there's adds every 3 seconds and it doesn't say so you push on it accidentally and then it takes you to google and the guns sound so fake don't get the app and its boring…
this is most worst game ever I have played 🤬 the laser is not coming out 🤯the ad is really fake 😤 don't install this 😓and don't waste your time 😩
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.0, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 3.0, updated 2026-03-05.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
gun-simulator-and-lightsaberAssessed 2026-10-25 from 400 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.