Serious warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 2 more things. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.45.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.45.0, updated 2026-10-21.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Experience the power of HARNA, an app designed to help you reach your most ambitious fitness goals. HARNA creates a personalized workout plan tailored to your needs and preferences.
Our main premium subscription gives you access to:
- A personalized workout plan tailored to your daily activity level, preferred workout days, and favorite types of main and restorative exercises.
- A wide variety of workouts, including Chair Yoga, Wall Pilates, Pilates, Yoga, and Indoor Walking and more.
- Easy-to-use catalogue featuring hundreds of workout collections. From weight loss routines and microworkouts to strength workouts, there’s something for everyone.
- Flexible workout settings — swap, remove, or add exercises anytime to match your goal or mood.
We also offer an optional subscription with personalized meal plans to help you achieve your goals even faster.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Surprise charges: raised by 31 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 16 reviews we read)
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Hard to cancel: raised by 15 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 33 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Misleading advertising: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 63 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 31 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 16 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
I am really disappointed their service — My experience did not match my expectations. During the sign-up process, I was repeatedly directed to payment pages and found it difficult to navigate away or cancel. As a result, my account was…
Billing sucks — I was tricked into purchasing $49.99 part of the program. I immediately contacted this company and now they won’t refund d me. I would not sign up for this program.
***BEWARE**** — I canceled my subscription after my trial, I wasn’t satisfied with the options in this app so I cancelled my plan, unfortunate for me i deleted my email confirming the cancellation, months go by and I get a notification…
This app is impossible to cancel — Do not purchase. Seriously
Cancel subscription — Can’t cancel
Awful — Impossible to cancel
Bait and switch — Prescription price was different than advertised
Unethical Company — Very misleading advertising. I thought the app was for older adults with mobility issues. It is not. I canceled within the trail period and was charged an additional 69.99. Will never recommend this company.
Bait and switch cost!!! — They were supposed to charge $9.99 for three weeks but then they tacked on a $50 charge and $100 charge for Things. I did not sign up for.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.45.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.45.0, updated 2026-10-21.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
You might have not noticed it, but we've fixed some bugs and made your experience even smoother.
Appworthy
harnaAssessed 2026-10-27 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.