Head Ball 2 is a thrilling and fast-paced multiplayer football game where you…
Masomo GamingFrom our automated analysis, 6 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.646 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.647, updated 2026-09-28.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Head Ball 2 is a thrilling and fast-paced multiplayer football game where you can challenge your opponents!. Take place in 1v1 online football matches against real opponents from all around the world.
Join millions of football players to prove yourself to the online football community and your friends.
Play 90-seconds of action-packed football matches; whoever scores more goals, wins!
Challenge your friends in real-time!
Get social by connecting your Facebook account and playing exciting football matches with your friends, show them who is the best! You can also join a football team or create your own team and gain different rewards as you win matches! Represent your team and face-off, different teams, to show which football team is superior. Contribute to your teams’ overall progress.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:166f25f535d2be067bc2574eece1bcdb20c582ec754fc2b2a15e5987011c01edAggressive ad load: raised by 85 distinct reviewers (10.1% of 843 reviews scanned)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 19 distinct reviewers (2.3% of 843 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
843 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 85 distinct reviewers — 10.1% of the 843 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
Good game but I'm sick and tired of all these ads after every single match. Just to get money off people they put a $5 option to remove ads. I'm deleting this game and never getting it again
poor video quality.. too much ads... 60sec of football like seriously..
if you guys like to watch ads then play this game , ads after every single match and if u want to relax then don't ever download and play this game because after seeing those continuous Ads, sure you need some 🍻. Alcohol is injurious to…
Complete pay to win and overrun with pop ups and adds. I sometimes get pop ups mid-match which I have to wait to get rid of which costs you points. It also has a huge issue that regardless of your internet the frame rate drops down hugely…
pay to win out the wazzoo characters literally have heads 3 to 4 x bigger than your character which makes the game completely unfair.
Don't waste time on this pay to win game....could have been a decent game, but the almighty greed is and always will be the problem with all these games. Pathetic
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 1.646, scanned 29 Sep 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.646 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.647, updated 2026-09-28.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
head-ball-2-google-com-masomo-headball2Assessed 2026-10-06 from 843 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.