Appworthy
Hard to cancel
2 independent sources agreeHard to cancel: raised by 12 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 33 reviews we read)
Definition
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Home Fitness Coach: FitCoach
FitCoach is a home fitness app for people who want to lose weight by completi…
WELLTECH APPS LIMITEDGoogle Play rating4.3★151.4K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryHealth & Fitness
DeveloperWELLTECH APPS LIMITED
What we found
Full reportSerious warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
Money
- Free to download · in-app purchases. Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.
- Hard to cancelConfirmed
- 20 users report unexpected chargesNot confirmed · about 1 in 20 reviews we read
- If you subscribe through the store, cancel in Google Play → Payments & subscriptions → Subscriptions. Deleting the app doesn’t cancel a subscription.
Positives
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 10.1.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 10.1.6, updated 2026-10-12.
Preview
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
About this app
FitCoach is a home fitness app for people who want to lose weight by completing home fitness workouts at their convenience. We offer a wide range of home fitness plans designed to help people achieve their weight-loss goals. Elevate your well-being with accessible and effective home fitness solutions.
FitCoach offers a variety of home fitness workouts to help you lose weight. We take your goals into account and create the most effective home fitness plan for weight loss.
Our full-body workouts have a moderate intensity to reduce the risk of injuries, making the app a great alternative to a personal home fitness trainer. Embrace a healthier lifestyle with our comprehensive home fitness program.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The full report
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings and evidence
Things to watch for 1
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Open evidence
Positives 2
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising SDKs
MeasuredNo advertising or mediation SDK among the 8 SDKs detected in the package
Definition
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:c492d0f0c8aafb267a9bafc12c5aeb18d977bde86b0ad9e7143dc3b1b01cc3c9Developer says data deletion can be requested
MeasuredThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
Definition
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 6
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress
One source onlyThe app's own text says: "Upgrade your training plan to achieve results faster"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:c492d0f0c8aafb267a9bafc12c5aeb18d977bde86b0ad9e7143dc3b1b01cc3c9A plan is pre-picked as 'recommended'
One source onlyPurchase screen steers the choice: "Best Value"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:c492d0f0c8aafb267a9bafc12c5aeb18d977bde86b0ad9e7143dc3b1b01cc3c9Reports of unexpected charges
One source onlySurprise charges: raised by 20 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 20 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
How we know
Countdown-timer purchase pressure
One source onlyDeadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:c492d0f0c8aafb267a9bafc12c5aeb18d977bde86b0ad9e7143dc3b1b01cc3c9Usable without an account
One source onlyThe app's own text says: "Continue as %1$s"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:c492d0f0c8aafb267a9bafc12c5aeb18d977bde86b0ad9e7143dc3b1b01cc3c9Works offline
One source onlyThe app's own text says: "Bulk"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:c492d0f0c8aafb267a9bafc12c5aeb18d977bde86b0ad9e7143dc3b1b01cc3c9What reviewers report
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Hard to cancel
Published findingI do not have an account and cannot unsubscribe but I am billed every month
Hard to cancel, but ok app. I'm just no longer interested in the subscription- I didn't realize I was paying for a subscription.
Super nice that the only button that doesn't work in the app is the manage subscription button so you can't cancel your subscription. DO NOT DOWNLOAD THIS
Reports of unexpected charges
Shown, not confirmedVery sneaky app that will take your money without you knowing - subscription doesn't show in the Google play subscriptions because they redirect you to their website. It's very sneaky as there is no way to manage your subscription through…
I do not have an account and cannot unsubscribe but I am billed every month
This app is a scam if you cancel they keep billing you. I've cancelled at least twice now and they still keep billing me.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Measurements
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
From store data and reviews
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the app package we scanned
Android package 10.1.6, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Sensitive permissions
1–2 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
Versions and dates analysed
This analysis describes version 10.1.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 10.1.6, updated 2026-10-12.
Store update history
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Google Play
Version 10.1.6 · 2026-10-12
No release notes were provided for this version.
Assessment record
- Status
- Automated analysis
- App identifier
home-fitness-coach- Assessment date
- 26 Oct 2026
- Sources used
- 6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
- Reviews read
- 400
- Package examined
- Android · 10.1.6 · scanned 26 Oct 2026
- Human inspection
- Not completed
Assessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
How we know
- Measurement vocabulary
- 1.4
How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-26 Version analyzed: 10.1.66 independent signals400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.
Store facts
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
Google Play
- Store rating
- 4.26 ★ · 151,370 ratings
- Version
- 10.1.6
- Updated
- 12 Oct 2026
- Price
- Free · In-app purchases
- Age rating
- 4+
- Size
- Not supplied
- Developer
- WELLTECH APPS LIMITED
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Listing price
- Free · In-app purchases
Purchases the store lists
What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.
Method and limits
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Limits of this report
- A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
- Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
- Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
- A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Request a correction
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.