Unwind with brain-teasing pin puzzles & decorate your dream home!
Gamee GlobalSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 15.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 15.0, updated 2026-10-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Unwind with brain-teasing pin puzzles & decorate your dream home!
Home Pin 2 combines relaxing gameplay with clever puzzles and heartwarming family stories. Tap to pull pins, solve logic challenges, and unlock new rooms to restore the family's manor!
🧠 Train your brain with satisfying logic puzzles
- Pull pins to rescue characters and recover hidden treasures
- Guide fire, water, and tools through clever physics traps
- Avoid lava, bombs, and tricky puzzles with smart strategy
🏠 Build and decorate your perfect manor
- Restore rooms, gardens, and secret areas
- Choose your favorite furniture, styles, and upgrades
- Unlock new story chapters as you renovate
🌟 Enjoy daily rewards & offline play
- New puzzles and special events every day
- Collect stars, coins, and power-ups
- Play anytime—no Wi-Fi required!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:f37188231a1111aad523d5fc51b9f5a1cef37dfff8d333698122a8afc807ea70Aggressive ad load: raised by 106 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 4 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:f37188231a1111aad523d5fc51b9f5a1cef37dfff8d333698122a8afc807ea70The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:f37188231a1111aad523d5fc51b9f5a1cef37dfff8d333698122a8afc807ea70400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
First, there are SO many ads, several after every puzzle. You'll spend four times as long watching ads as solving the puzzles. Second, many of the puzzles make no sense and end with stupid sayings like "cats don't have to look alike to be…
WARNING!! I just downloaded this game 10 minutes ago and I'm already going to delete it. Everyone is right about how ridiculous the ads are in this game. I have never experienced so many ads in so many ways. It's horrible. I got an ad…
While I'm glad someone actually tried to make something out of those damn false ads that plague the mobile game sphere now.... please stop clogging the game with so many ads. There's so many now they literally block the game and screen…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 15.0, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 15.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 15.0, updated 2026-10-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
home-pin-2Assessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.