Discover Your Future Face, Age Progression, Celebrity Look Like, and Explore…
GlintTec AppsSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 7.0.77 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 7.0.77, updated 2026-10-02.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Discover Your Future Face, Age Progression, Celebrity Look Like, and Explore Your Look as a Super Model, Actor, Actress, Doctor, Nurse, Pilot, Chef, Singer, Scientist, Engineer, Air Hostess, News Anchor, or even a Fire Fighter – with Stylish, Hipster, Anime, Mermaid Look, Vintage Filter, Fat Filter, Alien Filter, Robot Filter, Hybrid Filter, Funny Filters, Neon Effect, Sketch, Comic, Sticker, Pencil Art, and Hidden Faces. Try Rich Filter, Christmas, Carnival, Halloween, World Festival, and Culture Finder themes, or See Your Look from Different Countries and Paint Your Future with Your Baby – All in One App.
✔ Wondering “how old do I look” or what your future face may look like? Whether you want to try the age changer app young to old, explore celebrity look alike filters, or have fun with anime and cartoon photo styles, this app lets you do it all with just one photo.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 3 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager)
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:68645779331f369d1177a3ca9e8127b2ae755a6885b1f7f4d06d7371f2351644Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One time purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:68645779331f369d1177a3ca9e8127b2ae755a6885b1f7f4d06d7371f2351644The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:68645779331f369d1177a3ca9e8127b2ae755a6885b1f7f4d06d7371f2351644Offers a free trial ("Free Trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:68645779331f369d1177a3ca9e8127b2ae755a6885b1f7f4d06d7371f2351644The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:68645779331f369d1177a3ca9e8127b2ae755a6885b1f7f4d06d7371f2351644No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 7.0.77, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 7.0.77 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 7.0.77, updated 2026-10-02.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
how-old-do-i-lookAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.